May 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - messaging-service.xml in AS5 will be moved to messaging-bean

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

Stefan is closing in on moving the two mbean services currently defined in messaging-service.xml into messaging-beans.xml (which also currently exists). Should be done next week. I am unsure if I previously notified this. We are using the messaging beans to showcase injection of security domain beans.... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4154756#4154756 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4154756

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: deployers/metadata-beans.xml

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

DImitris, the renaming seems fine. I am unsure why I saw issues before. Theoretically, a change in name of the file should not be creating deployment order issues (because it is the beans inside, that matter). :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4154755#4154755 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4154755

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Annotation Tests in deployers-vfs

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | You can't use "does it already exist" in a symmetrical way on the undeploy, | but you can use "does it still exist if I remove the metadata components first". | But should I even care if I try to remove a component that is already removed? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4154741#4154741 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4154741

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Annotation Tests in deployers-vfs

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | In deploy direction it's easy --> component by that name already exists. | | How do you determine that on undeploy w/o any additional info? | | Attaching additional flag into attachments for that component name? | | Simple Set theory :-) | | Created Annotation components = All Possible Annotation Components - Components created via metadata | | You can't use "does it already exist" in a symmetrical way on the undeploy, | but you can use "does it still exist if I remove the metadata components first". | | In fact for the component deployers all you're really interested in is coming up | with a single set of component names to remove. | | So you could in principle change (optimize) the component deployers undeploy protocol | to just be something like: | | | | Set names = new HashSet(); | | names.addAll(metadataNames); | | names.addAll(annotationNames); | | removeComponents(names); | | | | But that's a bit restrictive in the unlikely case that the component deployer/visitor | wants to do something else besides removing the component. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4154738#4154738 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4154738

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: VFS and directory handling

by alesj

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : Can you validate with the hibernate team that this works for them? | It's probably more of a global issue, e.g. having any kind of PersistenceProvider work on our PersistenceDeployer. What we should do now is differentiate between this: 1) exploded inner dir containing persistence.xml 2) nested jar containing persistence.xml For 1) we strip the vfs prefix off, for 2) we return VFS URL, which will lead to VFSURLConnection --> VirtualFile.openStream --> ZipInputStream. I can add some VFSUtils.isNestedJar method which knows how diff between 1) and 2) based on the handler impl. OK? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4154731#4154731 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4154731

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - XARecoveryt with only non persistent messages

by adrian＠jboss.org

WRT JBossMQ bug http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-5571 I don't know if you have the same issue? I just wanted to check. JBossMQ has an optimization where if all messages in the transaction are non persistent it doesn't write the XID to the log but does XA_OK from prepare() which causes crash recovery problems since it doesn't return the XID from XAResource.recover() as the TM expects. The obvious optimization is to return READ_ONLY if all messages are non persistent (since no changes will go in the log) then you don't have a problem. But for JBossMQ it's hard to do that change, so I had to disable this optimization for XA transactions. :-( View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4154730#4154730 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4154730

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Annotation Tests in deployers-vfs

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : Don't you know which components came from metadata at undeploy using the same mechanism as was used at deploy? It's then just a case of making sure non-duplicates | from the annotations get removed as well. | Sure you know. But how do you know which are duplicates? ;-) In deploy direction it's easy --> component by that name already exists. How do you determine that on undeploy w/o any additional info? Attaching additional flag into attachments for that component name? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4154726#4154726 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4154726

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Is META-INF in the classpath?

by dimitris＠jboss.org

So META-INF/jboss-structure.xml is not needed after all, thanks! :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4154721#4154721 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4154721

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: How to disable redelivery for sync message call?

by lihui_pang

Hi Kevin, Thanks for the reply. I am using JBoss SOA p4.2.0. Can I still use the approach you mentioned in the post? or are there other ways to do it? Thanks, Lihui View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4154720#4154720 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4154720

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Annotation Tests in deployers-vfs

by adrian＠jboss.org

Don't you know which components came from metadata at undeploy using the same mechanism as was used at deploy? It's then just a case of making sure non-duplicates from the annotations get removed as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4154719#4154719 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4154719

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2008