September 2008 - jboss-dev-forums

[Design of OSGi Integration] - Re: OSGi Bundle Repository

by vickyk

I can see the rfc(http://www2.osgi.org/div/rfc-0112_BundleRepository.pdf) specifies the following package org.osgi.servicex.obr but I see the implementation with the package structure org.osgi.service.obr at here https://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/jboss-osgi/trunk/osgi-re... Why is there such difference? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4179508#4179508 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4179508

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of OSGi Integration] - Re: OSGi integration

by vickyk

"alesj" wrote : Ok, I'll first try to finish my current idea / impl, with delegation to existing OSGi framework. | Ales can I see this working? As per this plan the osgi deployer should be able to deploy the osgi bundles in the existing osgi container from other vendor. I have downloaded the code from here https://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/jboss-osgi Right now I see that the osgi bundles are being deployed by the Osgi Deployer in the MC, the osgi services are basically injected as the MC beans in the Microcontainer. I don't see the osgi classloading implementation yet. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4179501#4179501 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4179501

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Classloader-Registry in AS/ESB allows one central jbpm i

by kukeltje

anonymous wrote : So I think I do a crossposting in the ESB forum (Sorry Ronald ;-)). I'm not subscribed to the esb forum, so I do not mind :-P Regarding your proposal, You mention something about not deploying classes to the database but to a classpath. Are you thinking about some other way of versioning then or ditch it at all? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4179500#4179500 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4179500

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: gwt-console in distribution

by kukeltje

anonymous wrote : I am currently working on the RPC integration, which will probably use REST/Json interfaces between the client and the server. Aren't we going to leverage seam here? Or in other places? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4179498#4179498 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4179498

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Testing Bootstrap Dependencies

by istudens＠redhat.com

It works only if it is called from different targets. But if it is okay I will split the tests into separate targets. My last question: should I commit the tests into https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/trunk/testsuite/ or should I commit them into another place? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4179490#4179490 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4179490

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: perfSender/perfListener is acting weird

by timfox

Guys, please forget the optimising. We'll get to that once we have the code complete. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4179485#4179485 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4179485

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: perfSender/perfListener is acting weird

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : On persistent messages, I used to get 24K messages / second, and now I'm getting 17K messages / second. This is similar to the figures i was getting a few weeks ago, last time i ran the perf tests. anonymous wrote : if you run perfSender and perfListener as we aways used to run, sometimes you will not get all the messages on the client. I'll have a look today to see if this happens for me and do some investigating. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4179484#4179484 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4179484

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: gwt-console in distribution

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote : I will take a look at the command facade and keep you posted. let me know if i can be of assistence. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4179482#4179482 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4179482

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Logging JNDI names of beans at INFO level

by jaikiran

Andrew, I have created a feature enhancement request https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1507 for tracking this. Right now, its Unassigned (by default). If it's ok, i will assign it to myself and start work on it once i am done with EJBTHREE-1401. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4179479#4179479 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4179479

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Common marshalling infrastructure

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

OK, so my preliminary testing & tuning is showing that for large batches of Serializable or Externalizable objects, my default implementation is around twice as fast as the standard one (this is without using class or instance tables; though that would speed things up a little, large batches will benefit less from class tables than small batches will). I've only tested with Sun 1.5 and 1.6, 32- and 64-bit JVMs on Linux x86_84 though. I've yet to do a real test with many small batches. When I've gotten all this testing done I'll do up some pretty charts or something. More news as it comes in... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4179451#4179451 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4179451

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums September 2008