April 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: separate take task method

by jbarrez

I agree. This was something that was missing in 3. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4222986#4222986 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4222986

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - separate take task method

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

while documenting i realized that we need a separate takeTask method. previously i thought that we could just leverage the assignTask method for that. but taking a task also involves a check that the task is currently unassigned. e.g. if 2 people see a task in their takable task list, then the second one that clicks on 'Take' should get an error. in contrast, reassignment doesn't need that check. so we need to separate methods for take and assign. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4222974#4222974 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4222974

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: Implementing Transactions using JBOSS JTA for 2 phase co

by adinn

Please note that this is the design forum. It is intended for use by those who are implementing JBoss Transactions or related JBoss projects and wish to discuss design decisions concerning the implementation of JBoss Transactions. It is not appropriate for questions regarding how to use JBoss Transactions. Your question would be appropriate appropriate for the user forum: http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewforum&f=240 Please direct any future queries via that URL View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4222968#4222968 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4222968

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: JBossRetro cannot replace final reference to StringBuild

by chiba

Yes, renameClass() does not update local variable tables but this should not cause any problems at runtime because the JVM ignore local variable tables. So I am wondering what is Keren's problem... Keren, could you tell us? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4222964#4222964 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4222964

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Getting starding jms

by b16d

Hello, I am getting starting with jms and search some basics examples. There is somebody who can give me some examples? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4222963#4222963 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4222963

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Some more comments on examples so far

by gaohoward

anonymous wrote : I don't think this is very clear still. It would be better to handle the request and send back the response using a message listener, then you can send and consume several messages without having to do everything on the same thread. Agree, using a message listener is more meaningful. anonymous wrote : Also setting the JMSCorrelationID when sending the request doesn't make sense to me. It only needs to be set when sending the response back. Yes the ID is used to indicate which message the reply messages is for which request message. If not set it will be null. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4222962#4222962 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4222962

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Registering an XSD for use by a SchemaResolverDeployer

by wolfc

Basically the knowledge in SingletonSchemaResolverFactory's constructor should not be there. It's dependent on internals of the artifacts provided by consuming components. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4222960#4222960 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4222960

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JAXB Deployer

by alesj

"anil.saldhana(a)jboss.com" wrote : http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/branches/Branch_5_x/security/src/m... | Maybe the JAXBElementDeployer should go into deployers? I see no need, as I've fixed JAXBDeployer to handle enclosed differently. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4222958#4222958 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4222958

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Registering an XSD for use by a SchemaResolverDeployer

by wolfc

https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBXB-195 outlines a similar problem with prototype solution attached. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4222957#4222957 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4222957

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Annotation for MC bean

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

"anil.saldhana(a)jboss.com" wrote : "bstansberry(a)jboss.com" wrote : There may not be one anywhere. I don't think @Jndi actually works. (Not that the code doesn't work if the lifecycle-xxx declaration is there; just that applying the annotation doesn't currently do anything.) | | I think the lifecycle declaration for JndiBinding does not exist. Until that happens, the annotation is not useful. | | As I see it, the code for the lifecycle callbacks for JMX in the system folder are quite identical to the JMXCallback class. | This was something Scott started, not sure if it is used or not. "anil.saldhana(a)jboss.com" wrote : Kabir, there are two sets of callback classes (one in the system folder and the other is the JMXCallback). The lifecycle declaration is for the former. I guess lifecycle declaration can be for the latter alone (I am going to try it out on my annotation). Do you mean org.jboss.system.microcontainer.jmx.ServiceControllerXXXLifecycleCallback vs org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.aspects.jmx.JMXLifecycleCallback? JMXLifecycleCallback was the simple original version, the ServiceController ones are the next version for AS 5. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4222953#4222953 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4222953

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums April 2009