June 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: JBoss XB on IBM VM

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

Of course, that's the problem. You can't bind two different properties to the same attribute. If you look at the log you will see that one binding overrides the other. The difference between Sun and IBM is the order. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4239739#4239739 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4239739

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: JBoss XB on IBM VM

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

The output looks the same for IBM and Sun JDK: SUN | 11:48:24,761 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] Checking property clazz for org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata.IntroductionBeanMetaDataFactory type=java.lang.String | 11:48:24,761 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] Checking property clazz for org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata.IntroductionBeanMetaDataFactory type=java.lang.String | 11:48:24,761 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] resolving type java.lang.String | 11:48:24,761 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] resolving type java.lang.String | 11:48:24,761 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] resolved type java.lang.String binding=org.jboss.xb.binding.sunday.unmarshalling.SimpleTypeBinding@feb2ea[{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}string] | 11:48:24,761 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] resolved type java.lang.String binding=org.jboss.xb.binding.sunday.unmarshalling.SimpleTypeBinding@feb2ea[{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}string] | 11:48:24,761 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] Bound attribute class type=org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata.IntroductionBeanMetaDataFactory property=clazz propertyType=ReflectClassInfoImpl(a)945e31{name=java.lang.String}, normalizeSpace=false | 11:48:24,761 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] Bound attribute class type=org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata.IntroductionBeanMetaDataFactory property=clazz propertyType=ReflectClassInfoImpl(a)945e31{name=java.lang.String}, normalizeSpace=false | 11:48:24,761 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] Ignore not element @XmlAttribute for type=org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata.IntroductionBeanMetaDataFactory property=clazz | 11:48:24,761 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] Ignore not element @XmlAttribute for type=org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata.IntroductionBeanMetaDataFactory property=clazz | IBM | 12:01:04,604 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] Checking property clazz for org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata.IntroductionBeanMetaDataFactory type=java.lang.String | 12:01:04,604 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] Checking property clazz for org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata.IntroductionBeanMetaDataFactory type=java.lang.String | 12:01:04,604 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] resolving type java.lang.String | 12:01:04,604 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] resolving type java.lang.String | 12:01:04,604 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] resolved type java.lang.String binding=org.jboss.xb.binding.sunday.unmarshalling.SimpleTypeBinding@78be78be[{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}string] | 12:01:04,604 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] resolved type java.lang.String binding=org.jboss.xb.binding.sunday.unmarshalling.SimpleTypeBinding@78be78be[{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}string] | 12:01:04,605 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] Bound attribute class type=org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata.IntroductionBeanMetaDataFactory property=clazz propertyType=ReflectClassInfoImpl(a)2fac2fac{name=java.lang.String}, normalizeSpace=false | 12:01:04,605 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] Bound attribute class type=org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata.IntroductionBeanMetaDataFactory property=clazz propertyType=ReflectClassInfoImpl(a)2fac2fac{name=java.lang.String}, normalizeSpace=false | 12:01:04,605 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] Ignore not element @XmlAttribute for type=org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata.IntroductionBeanMetaDataFactory property=clazz | 12:01:04,605 TRACE [JBossXBBuilder] Ignore not element @XmlAttribute for type=org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata.IntroductionBeanMetaDataFactory property=clazz | I am not sure if I am looking in the right place, so I'll zip up and send you the full output. One thing that comes to mind might be that I am attempting to override how the class attribute is handled: | @JBossXmlSchema(namespace="urn:jboss:aop-beans:1.0", elementFormDefault=XmlNsForm.QUALIFIED) | @XmlRootElement(name="introduction") | @XmlType(name="introductionType", propOrder={}) | public class IntroductionBeanMetaDataFactory extends AspectManagerAwareBeanMetaDataFactory | implements BeanMetaDataFactory | { | ... | @XmlAttribute(name="class") | public void setClazz(String clazz) | { | this.clazz = clazz; | } | } | | public abstract class AspectManagerAwareBeanMetaDataFactory extends GenericBeanFactoryMetaData | { | ... | } | | @XmlRootElement(name="beanfactory") | @XmlType(name="beanfactoryType", propOrder={"aliases", "annotations", "classLoader", "constructor", "properties", "create", "start", "depends", "demands", "supplies", "installs", "uninstalls", "installCallbacks", "uninstallCallbacks"}) | public class GenericBeanFactoryMetaData extends JBossObject implements BeanMetaDataFactory, Serializable | { | ... | @XmlAttribute(name="class") | public void setBean(String bean) | { | this.bean = bean; | } | } | Although this works on Sun, maybe I should get rid of IBMDF.setClazz() and try to use the bean value from the super class instead? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4239712#4239712 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4239712

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBM2 jca adapter and connection factories

by timfox

"ataylor" wrote : | yes we still use the jms-ds.xml. currently there is one connection factory per jms-ds.xml. +1 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4239709#4239709 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4239709

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBM2 jca adapter and connection factories

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : For inbound I think we should share the connection factory unless its overridden, in which case we create a new one for that MDB type. | | The RA could maintain a "default" connection factory for use when nothing is overridden. +1, for this i need to add some code to check to see if anything has been overridden and some code to make sure non default factories etc are torn down when the mdb is deactivated. anonymous wrote : How does it work for outbound? Do we still use jms-ds.xml ?? yes we still use the jms-ds.xml. currently there is one connection factory per jms-ds.xml. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4239707#4239707 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4239707

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Adding a

by tfennelly

See JBESB-2548. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4239699#4239699 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4239699

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Adding a "max-connections-per-host" to the HttpClientFactory

by tfennelly

HttpClientFactory.createHttpClient creates a HttpConnectionManager instance and configures the "max-total-connections". This is somewhat irrelevant however as the HttpClient still has a default limit of 1 (or 2 - I forget) max connections per connected host, so will never use anything like the configured "max-total-connections". So it seems like we need to add support for a "max-connections-per-host" configuration. How should this work? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4239698#4239698 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4239698

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBM2 jca adapter and connection factories

by timfox

For inbound I think we should share the connection factory unless its overridden, in which case we create a new one for that MDB type. The RA could maintain a "default" connection factory for use when nothing is overridden. How does it work for outbound? Do we still use jms-ds.xml ?? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4239693#4239693 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4239693

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBM2 jca adapter and connection factories

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : When you say create a new Cf per MDB, do you mean per MDB *instance* or per MDB type? I mean per MDB activation, so per MDB deployed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4239689#4239689 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4239689

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBM2 jca adapter and connection factories

by timfox

Also.. how does it work with outbound? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4239684#4239684 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4239684

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBM2 jca adapter and connection factories

by timfox

When you say create a new Cf per MDB, do you mean per MDB *instance* or per MDB type? There may be many thousands of MDB instances (of the same type) in an AS. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4239683#4239683 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4239683

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums June 2009