June 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Moving microcontainer -> kernel

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

BTW if you already have the microcontainer trunk checked out, you don't need to check it out again. Just run this command: svn switch https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/kernel/trunk and you'll be in the new repository. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235481#4235481 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235481

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - CoreClientOverHTTPTest is commented out

by timfox

why? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235475#4235475 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235475

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: nanoSleep

by timfox

Ok, so how about we plump for 15K nano sleep, which should give us about 20K actual nano seconds, i.e. 20 microseconds... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235459#4235459 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235459

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - nanoSleep (Repost)

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I'm writing a native call to nanoSleep. As we have talked over IRC, I'm measuring the precision, and the weight of JNI calls. I have made a bunch of tests: I'm still editing this post.... I will resubmit it when I'm done... My conclusion is that it is close enough for 20K. Follows a table: Time IntervalNumber Of LoopsTime Taken 01,000,00017 milliseconds 1000 nanosecond1,000,0003856 milliseconds 20 K nanosecond1,000,00023312 milliseconds View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235453#4235453 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235453

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - nanoSleep

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I'm writing a native call to nanoSleep. As we have talked over IRC, I'm measuring the precision, and the weight of JNI calls. I have made a bunch of tests: I'm still editing this post.... I will resubmit it when I'm done... test test View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235453#4235453 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235453

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: proposal for demo.setup of GPD

by kukeltje

I did find something out in, there seems to be a configuration/preference/installer handler that can be defined in the feature.xml file. I did not see any example, but it could be used to change preferences install time, so maybe a default. Regarding JEE/Classic, the update mechanism could still be used. This was only for the demo.setup. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235452#4235452 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235452

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: proposal for demo.setup of GPD

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

I subscribe to the idea. But then we need to limit ourselves to a fresh instance of the Java or JEE edition of Eclipse, as the update mechanism will pull in the other dependencies when using the Classic version. Automatically adding user libraries is probably more tricky. They sit in the preferences whick is a part of the workspace. So if you want to do that, you probably need to ship a 'default' workspace as well (like we did in the past). Regards, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235451#4235451 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235451

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Moving microcontainer -> kernel

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

As advertised the move has now happened. To check out the kernel project, neÃ© microcontainer, you now check out https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/kernel/trunk/. https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/microcontainer/branches[/url] and [url]https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/microcontainer/tags contain the existing tags and branches for the current releases. Further 2.2.x releases will be tagged from https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/kernel/branches/Branch_2_2/[..., which will be a branch of [url]https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/kernel/trunk/ https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/microcontainer/mcdocs contains the documentation, managing its own branches and tags. https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/microcontainer/mc-release/ contains the tool for uploading all the mc artifacts to the downloads area, again managing its own branches and tags. Further projects 'global' to MC should be added under https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/microcontainer. The renames of the maven artifacts are as follows. This will only take effect from further 2.2.0 releases: org.jboss.microcontainer:jboss-microcontainer -> org.jboss.kernel:jboss-mc-kernel (parent) org.jboss.microcontainer:aop-mc-int -> org.jboss.kernel:aop-mc-int org.jboss.microcontainer:guice-int -> org.jboss.kernel:guice-int org.jboss.microcontainer:jboss-dependency -> org.jboss.kernel:jboss-dependency org.jboss.microcontainer:jboss-kernel -> org.jboss.kernel:jboss-kernel org.jboss.microcontainer:jmx-aop-mc-int -> org.jboss.kernel:jmx-aop-mc-int org.jboss.microcontainer:jmx-mc-int -> org.jboss.kernel:jmx-mc-int org.jboss.microcontainer:spring-int -> org.jboss.kernel:spring-int If there are more 2.1.x releases they will use the old group ids. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235449#4235449 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235449

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: proposal for demo.setup of GPD

by kukeltje

and maybe it is possible to add the user library automatically as well. Maybe Koen has some connections to find out. Google did not lead me to anything in 20 minutes. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235436#4235436 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235436

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - proposal for demo.setup of GPD

by kukeltje

Eclipse 3.4 has the option to use a drop-in directory, directly in the eclipse dir. It is possible to unzip the gpd site installer there in a subdir (e.g. called jbpm-gpd) and everything is ready to go. This way the users do not have to user the eclipse update-site mechanism. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235432#4235432 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235432

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums June 2009