July 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: package org.jboss.ws.metadata.umdm only available in 'na

by hansgk

Hi Richard+Daniel! Thank you for your very prompt responses! I tested the patch with an homebuild ESB 4.6 - and it looks fine. I swichted JBossESB Metro to homebuild stack/metro/branches/ropalka - as it seemed that AS 5.1 relies on newer SPI+COMMON - only present in 3.1.2-native/cfx... I will look into this tomorrow and file a bug if this is the case... Thanks! /hans Hans Guldager, Lenio View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4247020#4247020 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4247020

15 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: .classpath and .project to .svnignore

by camunda

Seems like all of them are checked in. Not sure if that is an accident or desired? I could delete them via TortoiseSVN directly... Eclipse is a pain in this area ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246992#4246992 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246992

15 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: refactoring org.jbpm.bpmn to org.jbpm.bpmn.internal?

by kukeltje

I'm in doubt. I can add a field to BpmnActivity and set that when parsing so the behaviour of forking or not is controlled by that. The other option is to do it in the activity by passing e.g. a boolean parameter to 'leaveBpmnActivity' or have two methods 'leaveForked' and 'leaveSingle' or something. I'll imlpement the one with the boolean parameterd first since that is already in place. Can always be refactored. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246974#4246974 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246974

15 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: refactoring org.jbpm.bpmn to org.jbpm.bpmn.internal?

by kukeltje

I'm in doubt. I can add a field to BpmnActivity and set that when parsing so the behaviour of forking or not is controlled by that. The other option is to do it in the activity by passing e.g. a boolean parameter to 'leaveBpmnActivity'. I'll do the latter first since that is already in place. Can always be refactored. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246973#4246973 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246973

15 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: refactoring org.jbpm.bpmn to org.jbpm.bpmn.internal?

by kukeltje

anonymous wrote : Is it necessary? Isn't it internal by default at the moment? Just get longer package names :-/ True anonymous wrote : Hmm, but it aligns it with jpdl, eh? More true ;-) I'll do this tonight when it is quiet. anonymous wrote : | Anyway, I committed the last local changes (without that hack in the PVM), so if you want you ccan go ahead. | Cool, we are in good agreement here. Only thing I'll do additionally is to introduce a boolean 'forkAllowed' so this generic method is easily reused in tasks, *all* gateways etc... anonymous wrote : | P.S: Sorry, I moved a test case from parallelGatewayTest to UserTaskTest No that's fine. I had the same idea. It's the behaviour of the task, not the gateeway that is important. Otoh, it was a cool test to see that a converging parallel gateway works great without a diverging one. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246969#4246969 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246969

15 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: refactoring org.jbpm.bpmn to org.jbpm.bpmn.internal?

by camunda

Is it necessary? Isn't it internal by default at the moment? Just get longer package names :-/ Hmm, but it aligns it with jpdl, eh? Anyway, I committed the last local changes (without that hack in the PVM), so if you want you ccan go ahead. P.S: Sorry, I moved a test case from parallelGatewayTest to UserTaskTest View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246961#4246961 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246961

15 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - refactoring org.jbpm.bpmn to org.jbpm.bpmn.internal?

by kukeltje

Anyone agree/disagree? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246957#4246957 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246957

15 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - .classpath and .project to .svnignore

by kukeltje

Does someone know how to do that from eclipse? In my workspace the menu item is disabled or if some could do it and check it in... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246956#4246956 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246956

15 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [BPMN2] How to implement uncontrolled sequence flow beha

by kukeltje

"tom.baeyens(a)jboss.com" wrote : the real solution is to implement it in the BPMN activity base class. | | add a method to the BpmnActivity like leaveBpmnActivity(ExecutionImpl execution) | I'll do that. Filed https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2458 "tom.baeyens(a)jboss.com" wrote : | (ps you already might have noticed that in our own implementations, it is best to use the impl classes and not the interfaces) The impl of the pvm? Hmm... missed that, maybe because Bernd already did some work before me. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246951#4246951 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246951

15 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [BPMN2] How to implement uncontrolled sequence flow beha

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

"ronald" wrote : | - dueDate -> duedate, but named queries not updatred jbpm.execution.hbm.xml : Koen Sorry guys, I committed the additional change. I ran the tests this time and they give me green light... Cheers, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246928#4246928 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246928

15 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2009