anonymous wrote : Is it necessary? Isn't it internal by default at the moment? Just
get longer package names :-/
True
anonymous wrote : Hmm, but it aligns it with jpdl, eh?
More true ;-)
I'll do this tonight when it is quiet.
anonymous wrote :
| Anyway, I committed the last local changes (without that hack in the PVM), so if you
want you ccan go ahead.
|
Cool, we are in good agreement here. Only thing I'll do additionally is to introduce a
boolean 'forkAllowed' so this generic method is easily reused in tasks, *all*
gateways etc...
anonymous wrote :
| P.S: Sorry, I moved a test case from parallelGatewayTest to UserTaskTest
No that's fine. I had the same idea. It's the behaviour of the task, not the
gateeway that is important. Otoh, it was a cool test to see that a converging parallel
gateway works great without a diverging one.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246969#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...