May 2010 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [jBPM Development] - Why cannot use slash(/) in activity name

by HuiSheng Xu

HuiSheng Xu [http://community.jboss.org/people/rebody] replied to the discussion "Why cannot use slash(/) in activity name" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/545300#545300 -------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you very much Maciej. I will go back to make sure if GroupActivity had these feature. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/545300#545300] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [jBPM Development] - Why cannot use slash(/) in activity name

by Maciej Swiderski

Maciej Swiderski [http://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej] replied to the discussion "Why cannot use slash(/) in activity name" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/545276#545276 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi HuiSheng, I think it comes from jBPM v3. There is support for hierahical names support on transitions. Here are some useful links that can put some light on it: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/GPD-20 https://jira.jboss.org/browse/GPD-20 http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v3/userguide/processmodelling.html#hierarchica... http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v3/userguide/processmodelling.html#hierarchica... I am not sure if that is valid for 4.x. I made a quick test and that worked fine for a very simple case. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/545276#545276] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [jBPM Development] - JBPM-2875 enhance classloader strategy for OSGi

by HuiSheng Xu

HuiSheng Xu [http://community.jboss.org/people/rebody] replied to the discussion "JBPM-2875 enhance classloader strategy for OSGi" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/545241#545241 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Maciej, Thank you for reviewing. I had commited it. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/545241#545241] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] - Why cannot use slash(/) in activity name

by HuiSheng Xu

HuiSheng Xu [http://community.jboss.org/people/rebody] created the discussion "Why cannot use slash(/) in activity name" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/545240#545240 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi guys, It is totally weird, that jPDL didn't allow using slash(/) in activity name. I searched though XML specification and there is no limitation for this. And, there is no such limitation for transition name, only for activity name. Now our customer's process need put a slash(/) in an activity name, I went to do some demostration, Every designing stuff are all right. Then when I try to deploy the process, it tell me the process is invalid. It is horrible. So I really want to know, is there any reason that we shouldn't use slash(/) in activity name? Because if this rule is not necessary, I didn't want to tell our customers that they must change their process to remove all of slash(/). Here is the validation in JpdlBinding.java public void parseName(Element element, ActivityImpl activity, Parse parse) { String name = XmlUtil.attribute(element, "name", isNameRequired(), parse); if (name!=null) { // basic name validation if ("".equals(name)) { parse.addProblem(XmlUtil.errorMessageAttribute(element, "name", name, "is empty"), element); } else if (name.indexOf('/')!=-1) { parse.addProblem(XmlUtil.errorMessageAttribute(element, "name", name, "contains slash (/)"), element); } activity.setName(name); } } -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/545240#545240] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [jBPM Development] - SubProcess signaling issue

by HuiSheng Xu

HuiSheng Xu [http://community.jboss.org/people/rebody] replied to the discussion "SubProcess signaling issue" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/545235#545235 -------------------------------------------------------------- I see. Because getSubProcessInstance() method is part of Execution interface, So you don't want to use its sub interface 'ProcessInstance'. And I can understand now. Then I think we could go ahead. :) -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/545235#545235] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [jBPM Development] - SubProcess signaling issue

by Maciej Swiderski

Maciej Swiderski [http://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej] replied to the discussion "SubProcess signaling issue" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/545234#545234 -------------------------------------------------------------- I'm just wondering if it is a good practice use sub interface type in super interface?! Since getSubProcessInstance method is exposed via Execution interface it was more logical to me to use return type of this interface. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/545234#545234] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [jBPM Development] - SubProcess signaling issue

by HuiSheng Xu

HuiSheng Xu [http://community.jboss.org/people/rebody] replied to the discussion "SubProcess signaling issue" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/545224#545224 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Maciej, Since we can make sure that sub process instance is alway a 'ProcessInstance' type, why not use 'ProcessInstance' type as the return type of getSubProcessInstance() ? I think this is more meaningful. ProcessInstance getSubProcessInstance(); -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/545224#545224] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [Management Development] - domain.xml work

by Scott Stark

Scott Stark [http://community.jboss.org/people/scott.stark%40jboss.org] replied to the discussion "domain.xml work" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/545191#545191 -------------------------------------------------------------- Some initial work on a collection of xml schema files to codify the notion of the domain metadata model have been uploaded here: http://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossASDomainSchema http://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossASDomainSchema I followed our http://community.jboss.org/wiki/DomainManagementModelDesign http://community.jboss.org/wiki/DomainManagementModelDesign for the structure and incorporated some of our existing schemas as a starting point to see how well these would pull together since the domain metadata ultimately needs to map onto this view where it exists. In general, the imported schemas expose too much detail, and there need to be better cross cutting configuration notions for common services such as security, threads, pools, remoting, logging, etc. We need alternate domain admin views similar to what I did with the profiles where it is very much simplified and only focused on the requirements the admin is looking for. There is no notion of deployments at this level. Of course there is a ton of configuration data to add for the various containers as well. I'm handing this off to Alexey, so good luck! -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/545191#545191] Start a new discussion in Management Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss ESB Development] - Camel integration input requested

by David Ward

David Ward [http://community.jboss.org/people/dward] replied to the discussion "Camel integration input requested" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/545173#545173 -------------------------------------------------------------- The CamelGateway has been committed to trunk in revision 33127. Woot! -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/545173#545173] Start a new discussion in JBoss ESB Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [jBPM Development] - JBPM-2875 enhance classloader strategy for OSGi

by Maciej Swiderski

Maciej Swiderski [http://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej] replied to the discussion "JBPM-2875 enhance classloader strategy for OSGi" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/545161#545161 -------------------------------------------------------------- it looks good to me. It should not have any side effects so I would say it is worth including if that could help to evaluate jBPM more on OSGi. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/545161#545161] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2010