Are you referring to using the same tools and common binary across branches? I don't
think we should go this route because tools changes often impact metadata, tools, and
common/core. Therefore if we did this we would surely end up maintaining multiple versions
of binary dependencies which is just as much if not more work (since you would need
branches for each subcomponent).
The only diversion that I think is necessary for 4.2 is a couple of configuration lines
for remoting. IMO as long as this is true, I think it would be better just to add code
that detects which version of remoting, and then configures appropriately across all
versions.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3991526#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...