"ataylor" wrote : anonymous wrote : Sure, but that doesn't mean they need to be munged (re-assembled) into a single buffer. | | Actually I'm just holding them in a list until ready. | | AFAICT from the code you maintain it in the list, but then just call Packet.decode with the list which just copies the whole thing into a single body buffer - so it does get munged. What would be nice is if we could maintain the same buffers in the packet as a list, so no copying. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167882#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...