August 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: Problems Jboss 4.0.2/JKD1.4.2/Profiler1.0.RC3/Solaris 9

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

It looks like you don't have JAVA_HOME variable defined. If this is not the case, it's weird. I just compiled on Linux using GCC. (I don't have access to GCC/G++ on the solaris box I have access now. I'm just using solaris CC and cc). Verify you JAVA_HOME variable. It looks like GCC it's not finding $JAVA_HOME/include and $JAVA_HOME/include/solaris as include directories. This comes from compile.sh: _INCLUDES="-I$JAVA_HOME/include -I$JAVA_HOME/include/solaris -I../../src/zlib" View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3962321#3962321 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3962321

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Serialization] - Re: StackOverflow in my datatypes

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Another way to address this is by increasing your JVM's stack size (-Xss) That would give you more room for recursive calls View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3962319#3962319 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3962319

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Eclipse IDE (dev)] - Re: WAS: Hibernate Tools not forward compatible with WTP (@h

by dlmiles

Unfortunately I don't have the answers to making it easy for a new user to get started (over and above an all-in-one archive). The way I see the Eclipse architecture is that each feature should principally be distrubuted in isolatation first. "Runtime only" version that is the way nature intended. You are already in no-mans-land when you start distributing anything between an all-in-one and runtime only and thats a hiding to nothing in the future with with permutations of platform and feature sets and to this I can't really offer anything. There maybe suggestions that can be made to update manager development team on this, for example if after a platform restart (or -clean) a new feature/plugin is detected and it can not be activated (due to missing dependancies) then they get a prompt on screen offering was to resolve that problem by locating and downloading those missing dependancies. The way I see the new user problem at the moment is that the platform does not help them enough when a pre-requisite problem occurs. When I think that issue should be in their face to deal with (or ignored) as soon as its detected, even little things like notification confirming a new plugin was detected and is activated giving the user positive feedback their unzip worked correctly. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3962269#3962269 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3962269

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Eclipse IDE (dev)] - Re: WAS: Hibernate Tools not forward compatible with WTP (@h

by mculpepper＠jboss.com

Just read over the thread and the comments in Hibernate JIRA... To make a "runtime-only" bundle of Hibernate Tools (or any of JBossIDE's components) would be a relatively easy thing to do from the perspective of our build process. The only issue that comes to mind is the "further" confusing of multiple types of downloads... imagine now that we will have: - Bundle downloads for win32+linux (eclipse+all components plugins/features+dependencies) - ALL downloads (all components plugins/features+dependencies) - 8-10 standalone component downloads (component plugins/features + dependencies) - 8-10 "Runtime" downloads (component plugins/features ONLY) So basically that pumps up the number of files to the low 20s. If we re-use our download matrix/guide methodology we can probably structure the page in such a way where it isn't as confusing, but for users who are just browsing our sourceforge page they would be SOL =). Anyway, I'm not saying "no", I think we just need to discuss the best way of going about doing this. This discussion also prompts me to ask another question: Should we rethink the way we are distributing releases? Most eclipse plugins only package themselves as "runtime" plugins, and then maybe have a "Bundle" that includes dependencies, but no where near the level of granularity in component/dependencies that we do. Would users suffer to much if we threw that out the window? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3962259#3962259 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3962259

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Eclipse IDE (dev)] - WAS: Hibernate Tools not forward compatible with WTP (@hiber

by dlmiles

WAS: Hibernate Tools not forward compatible with WTP (@hibernate tools forum) Everything is better said from the original forum article: http://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?t=962374 http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HBX-709 This is a Request for comments from those developers reading this forum. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3962254#3962254 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3962254

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: trunk ejb3 build

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Also, cglib should not be used in jbossas. Javassit should be the only proxy framework being used. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3962225#3962225 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3962225

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - trunk ejb3 build

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

The jbossas trunk build of ejb3 is out of synch with the 4.0 branch version in that its pulling in way too many dependencies on thirdparty components that should not be in the jbossas ejb3 deployer. This needs to be cleaned up. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3962222#3962222 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3962222

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Serialization] - Re: StackOverflow in my datatypes

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Both JBoss and Java Serialization uses a lot of recursivity. Your class has probably a very deep object graph. You probably has relationship between your objects, and every single object is a new object. (what is forcing the deep stack trace). If you have multiple objects with the same ID, you should cache them trying to diminish the number of instances in your graph. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3962161#3962161 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3962161

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: next steps for the console webapp

by kukeltje

Tom, JEE vs. JSE : Sorry, keeboord error Tomahawk are JSF UI Components. The default datatable in JSF is not sortable, ,pagable, not even the one in myfaces etc.. So instead of completely developping our own it is imo not a problem to depend on them. The functionality is so basic that if someone wants to switch to a comparable jsf ui comonent set, it is possible. Regarding the tasklist backed bean, I agree and that is what is fairly easy to do. The only issues remains the sortability and paging as commented in the JIRA issue http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-436 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3962124#3962124 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3962124

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Serialization] - StackOverflow in my datatypes

by Issahar

Hi. I need to serialize a graph that is implemented as HashMap. This graph is very complicated, and the java serialization gives StackOverflowError. I tried Jboss Serialization, and it gives TargetInvocationException, which just wrapped a StackOverflowError. can something be done? is it being addressed? I need some help, and quick... thanx, Issahar. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3962121#3962121 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3962121

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums August 2006