September 2006 - jboss-dev-forums

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: VFS isLeaf() vs isDirectory()/isFile()

by adrian＠jboss.org

or WEB-INF folder in the WARStructureDeployer View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974885#3974885 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974885

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: VFS isLeaf() vs isDirectory()/isFile()

by adrian＠jboss.org

"bill.burke(a)jboss.com" wrote : "scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | - we need to support a virtual war/ejb-jar that is directory, that does not have to end in .war/.jar, containing war/ejb-jar contents. | | | | This is especially true for embedded jboss. | This already works, provided it is a top level directory or it has a META-INF folder, see the JARStruture deployer. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974884#3974884 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974884

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Negotiate with Kerberos

by cdelashmutt

The silent authentication part is what that plug in is addressing. There are some changes that need to be made to the code as it currently is relying on some classes in the tomcat jars, and I also need to write up some instructions for including other login modules for getting groups. If you didn't need silent authentication, then you could use the straight LDAP login modules to authenticate with Active Directory. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974882#3974882 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974882

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: VFS isLeaf() vs isDirectory()/isFile()

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : | - we need to support a virtual war/ejb-jar that is directory, that does not have to end in .war/.jar, containing war/ejb-jar contents. | This is especially true for embedded jboss. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974881#3974881 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974881

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: @Documented on javax.annotation.Resource?

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

download the spec and find out. I guess make it @Documented unless the TCK tests fail. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974880#3974880 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974880

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: VFS isLeaf() vs isDirectory()/isFile()

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

This makes more sense to me, although I still don't believe isArchive is sufficiently different from isLeaf == false to warrant an attribute. Its essentially isLeaf == false + a suffix pattern to indicate this is a special non-leaf. The suggested change of the VFScanner defines such a special non-leaf such that only archives can contain deployable content. Its not clear that the vfs really has sufficient knowledge of a non-leaf to make this distinction. Examples include: - jars referenced via Class-Path manifest references are not to be considered as deployments. - we need to support a virtual war/ejb-jar that is directory, that does not have to end in .war/.jar, containing war/ejb-jar contents. I think we need a basic vfs notion, and an attributed vfs notion where the attributed vfs is a result of metadata coming from the structural analysis. In the attributed vfs I can ask is a non-leaf a deployment container or not. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974879#3974879 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974879

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Updating docs

by adrian＠jboss.org

I'm not talking about the default datasource java:/DefaultDS I'm talking about the default resource-ref binding (or its annotation equivalent) | <resource-ref> | <res-ref-name>jdbc/DataSource</res-ref-name> | <jndi-name>java:/DefaultDS</jndi-name> | </resource-ref> | which can be set at any level and would get "merged" into the ENC. This could be set at the server scope. The same thing happens with 1) Class annotation at the class scope 2) XML overrides at the instance scope (if you assume instance generically means bean instance for POJOs or EJB container of EJB deployments) The user still wants to know: 1) What is the ENC for this instance (merged). 2) Where are these values configured in my deployments (what they actually change) which can affect multiple instances depending on the scope. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974876#3974876 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974876

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Collaboration Server] - Re: JBCS & ClamAV Antivirus

by acoliver＠jboss.org

Yes....depending on how you read that....it could have been very.....wrong. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974875#3974875 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974875

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: 3.2 alpha 1 release status

by falazar

Yes I believe that was the function. We attempted to change it with no luck, but then finally just create another one which covers the rest caleld finSwimlanePooledTaskInstances() because if you just have pooled users in a swimlane with a task it will NOT currently show up in the web app. James View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974874#3974874 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974874

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: 3.2 alpha 1 release status

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

"falazar" wrote : A couple things we have noticed in heavy work on the web console is that the task assigned to swimlanes or pooled users is not showing up in the web console (thought the db shows them correctly), Are you referring to the results of TaskMgmtSesssion.findPooledTaskInstances()? "falazar" wrote : It seems like a couple of these tables may not be normalized very well either. I'm with you there, but from talking to Tom I don't think we can expect this to change in the 3.x series, since we're going to avoid any sweeping database changes, especially those that would introduce compatibility problems... Tom, correct me if I'm wrong. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974873#3974873 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974873

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums September 2006