jboss-dev-forums May 2007

jboss-dev-forums@lists.jboss.org

1 participants
494 discussions

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - JBREM-645: Need to cleanup locatorURI parsing

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

It looks like adhering strictly to RFC 2396 "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax" will entail semantic changes to InvokerLocator. The example I see is the treatment of the path component. By definition, the URI path component begins with "/", but InvokerLocator.getPath() doesn't return the initial "/". Is it likely that changing getPath() to return the initial "/" would break existing software? If so, a deprecated "classic" mode (settable by system property or static InvokerLocator switch) could be offered in the Remoting 2 InvokerLocator class and eliminated in Remoting 3. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4042033#4042033 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4042033

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss internal QA (Test Suite)] - Re: Server-side Testsuite Logging

by ryan.campbell＠jboss.com

This sounds like a nice solution. Understanding testsuite server logs has always been difficult b ecause there was no correlation. This should definitely be on by default for every test suite run. I see no reason why you wouldn't want this information. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4042022#4042022 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4042022

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss internal QA (Test Suite)] - Re: Server-side Testsuite Logging

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : but given that it would only be used with the testsuite, this may not lead to a great saving In my personal opinion this would be a nice thing to have, if this can be done without breaking other stuff. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4042018#4042018 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4042018

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss internal QA (Test Suite)] - Re: Server-side Testsuite Logging

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

On JBossMessaging we have a super class where we use setUp and tearDown to synchronize server and client logs. http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/messaging/trunk/tests/src/org/jboss/test/m... It is true though we aways call super.tearDown and super.setUp in all sub classes. Maybe it's possible to do the same thing with some double check on sub-classes. Example: http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/messaging/trunk/tests/src/org/jboss/test/m... I don't know how this would behave with deployment setups from JBossTestCase, but it is a good idea to at least have the className on server side. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4042015#4042015 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4042015

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

← Newer
1
...
47
48
49
50
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2007