October 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Heavy usage of VirtualFileURLConnection

by alesj

I added JMX statistics about this to JBossAS. And I'm seeing some minor issue - nothing than cannot be fixed. ;-) | VFSContext Root URI | conf file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/conf/ | jboss-aop-asintegration-core.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-aop-asintegration-core.jar | lib file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/lib/ | jboss-deployers-vfs.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-deployers-vfs.jar | jboss-mbeans.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-mbeans.jar | jboss-aop-asintegration-mc.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-aop-asintegration-mc.jar | deploy file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/deploy/ | jboss-bindingservice.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/lib//jboss-bindingservice.jar | jboss-system-jmx.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-system-jmx.jar | jaxb-impl.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jaxb-impl.jar | jboss-service.xml file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/conf/jboss-service.xml | jboss-deployers-spi.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-deployers-spi.jar | jboss-aop-asintegration-jmx.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-aop-asintegration-jmx.jar | jboss-deployers-impl.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-deployers-impl.jar | jboss-deployers-client-spi.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-deployers-client-spi.jar | wstx.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//wstx.jar | jboss-deployers-structure-spi.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-deployers-structure-spi.jar | jboss-system.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-system.jar | deployers file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/deployers/ | jboss-deployers-core-spi.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-deployers-core-spi.jar | jboss-j2se.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-j2se.jar | jboss-jmx.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-jmx.jar | jboss-deployers-client.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-deployers-client.jar | jboss-deployers-vfs-spi.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-deployers-vfs-spi.jar | dom4j.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//dom4j.jar | jboss-deployers-core.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-deployers-core.jar | jboss-aop-jboss5.jar file:/C:/projects/jboss5/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib//jboss-aop-jboss5.jar Just need to find out where that double // is coming in. Otherwise it looks good == behaves as expected. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4186013#4186013 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4186013

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBMDR-51; Annotation equals is completely broken

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Yes, a 2.0.1.GA is what we should do. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4186010#4186010 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4186010

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Behavior when next state in a

by kukeltje

That was not Heiko, but Bernd, and I agree with him. JBoss has knowledge about integrating the two technologies since the have some of the Exadel guys on board (Sergey Smirnov, see http://www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=GWTandJSF) Seam btw, also has GWT integration, but indeed is more focussed on JSF afaik. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185997#4185997 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185997

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBMDR-51; Annotation equals is completely broken

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : | Do we have some generic code for arrays compare? | So that I don't re-invent the wheel. ;-) Too late, re-invented. :-) | if (Objects.isArray(value)) | { | if (Objects.isArray(other) == false) | return Boolean.FALSE; | | int length = Array.getLength(value); | if (length != Array.getLength(other)) | return Boolean.FALSE; | | for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) | { | if (JBossObject.equals(Array.get(value, i), Array.get(other, i)) == false) | return Boolean.FALSE; | } | } | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185968#4185968 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185968

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBMDR-51; Annotation equals is completely broken

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : | | | try | | { | | Proxy.getInvocationHandler(obj); | | } | | catch (Exception ex) | | { | | return Boolean.FALSE; | | } | | return Boolean.TRUE; | | } | | | I've changed this with | for (String key : map.keySet()) | { | Object value = getValue(key); | Object other = getBeanInfo().getProperty(obj, key); | if (Objects.isArray(value)) | { | if (Objects.isArray(other) == false) | return Boolean.FALSE; | | // TODO - how to generically compare arrays; primitives vs. objects | if (Arrays.equals(...) == false) | return Boolean.FALSE; | } | else if (JBossObject.equals(value, other) == false) | return Boolean.FALSE; | } | but see my TODO. Do we have some generic code for arrays compare? So that I don't re-invent the wheel. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185965#4185965 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185965

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - JBMDR-51; Annotation equals is completely broken

by alesj

This AnnotationProxy::doEquals looks like it misses a lot of logic. ;-) | private Object doEquals(Object proxy, Object obj) | { | if (obj == proxy) | return Boolean.TRUE; | if (obj == null) | return Boolean.FALSE; | | Class[] intfs = proxy.getClass().getInterfaces(); | if (intfs[0].isAssignableFrom(obj.getClass()) == false) | { | return Boolean.FALSE; | } | try | { | Proxy.getInvocationHandler(obj); | } | catch (Exception ex) | { | return Boolean.FALSE; | } | return Boolean.TRUE; | } | And that last attempt is wrong, e.g. this is totally legit, but would also fail: | String expr = "@"+Name.class.getName() + "(type=\"type\",subtype=\"subtype\")"; | Name n0 = (Name) AnnotationCreator.createAnnotation(expr, Name.class); | Name n2 = new NameImpl("type", "subtype"); | assertEquals(n0, n2); // FAILURE -- n2 has no InvocationHandler | I'll fix the impl, but what to do with release, since we already did 2.0.0.GA? 2.0.1.GA? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185962#4185962 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185962

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Behavior when next state in a

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"camunda" wrote : | anonymous wrote : | | So I still think a component library that directly knows how to interact with jBPM is something that would be/is great to provide. | | | +1! But the problem may be, which technology to provide. But I think Facelets weren't such a bad idea... Heiko, do you mean to a JSF or GWT component library that people can use to display the task list in their apps ? Find a replacement for Facelets for the task forms technology might be difficult given that Facelets is: * a simple library for template rendering * rendering can be done easily programatically * based on XHTML, so easy for users to customize the generated templates Seam also uses Facelets for rendering the content of emails. That is what I would like to move to as well. Then seam (ui and email) and jbpm (task forms and email) are all based on the same simple technology. Heiko, do you see a viable alternative for Facelets ? Maybe there is some templating component in GWT ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185955#4185955 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185955

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Removing HSQLDB

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

for development, i want in-process, in-memory db. i never got that easily working with other db's then hqldb. for the matrix, we should focus on the DB's that the SOA platform supports (assuming that includes what the community wants) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185947#4185947 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185947

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - [jboss-metadata] Release of 1.0.0.CR4

by ALRubinger

Anything blocking this release? JIRA reports JBMETA-139 outstanding and critical, so I'm holding the release until this is done or someone demotes its priority. Alexey, Emanuel tells me you're fielding this while he's on holiday? S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185942#4185942 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185942

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Behavior when next state in a

by camunda

anonymous wrote : | So my conclusion would be that the target usage of the console would still be: | - RAD (initial demonstration of a process) | - management things. | +1 anonymous wrote : | So I still think a component library that directly knows how to interact with jBPM is something that would be/is great to provide. | +1! But the problem may be, which technology to provide. But I think Facelets weren't such a bad idea... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185940#4185940 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185940

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums October 2008