October 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Some comments on new scheduled delivery work

by timfox

"ataylor" wrote : I also would like to write a core integration test that forces paging from the off and then force a depage to make sure that the message is reloaded correctly, i could only write a unit test for this, maybe Clebert can help? Why could you only write a unit test for this? You can start the server with low values of paging surely. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4180976#4180976 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4180976

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Some comments on new scheduled delivery work

by timfox

"ataylor" wrote : | This is ScheduledMessageTest but since it relies on timing i put in under the timing tests. Ok, looking at the test it looks like an integration tests to me, so should live in integration/something. I'd also add some tests which test basic scheduled functionality, single and multiple subscribers, mixture of scheduled and non scheduled messages. Mixtures of different scheduled times etc. Take a look at the jms test for ideas. Timing tests are basically unit tests which have long pauses etc in them, not integration tests. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4180975#4180975 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4180975

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Some comments on new scheduled delivery work

by ataylor

I also would like to write a core integration test that forces paging from the off and then force a depage to make sure that the message is reloaded correctly, i could only write a unit test for this, maybe Clebert can help? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4180974#4180974 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4180974

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Some comments on new scheduled delivery work

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : It would be a good idea to add tests for routing a message to multiple queues, and testing that redelivery delay is handled separately for each reference. ok anonymous wrote : Don't worry too much about unit tests, more important is to have the core functionality tested at the core level. This is ScheduledMessageTest but since it relies on timing i put in under the timing tests. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4180971#4180971 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4180971

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Some comments on new scheduled delivery work

by timfox

Don't worry too much about unit tests, more important is to have the core functionality tested at the core level. I think these are currently missing. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4180970#4180970 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4180970

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Labs] - broken link

by xpavlic4

On page http://www.jboss.org/jsfunit/demo.html there is a link to http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/JSFUnit/, which is not working. Radim View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4180969#4180969 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4180969

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Some comments on new scheduled delivery work

by timfox

It would be a good idea to add tests for routing a message to multiple queues, and testing that redelivery delay is handled separately for each reference. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4180967#4180967 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4180967

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Some comments on new scheduled delivery work

by timfox

"ataylor" wrote : | | So at what point do i add a record to the journal then? I guess i just need to add the queue id and the message id to the encoding. | Yes, the same as is currently done for acknowledgements, which are also at the message reference level as opposed to the message level. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4180965#4180965 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4180965

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Some comments on new scheduled delivery work

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : a) Can you tell your formatter to add a space between if statements and the opening brace? It already is, I musn't have formatted this piece of code. anonymous wrote : b) Main issue. Scheduled delivery time is being stored in the journal at the message level. However, it should be an attribute of the message reference, not the message. (See my earlier post) So at what point do i add a record to the journal then? I guess i just need to add the queue id and the message id to the encoding. anonymous wrote : ) Can you point me to the core tests for this functionality? | | If you're going to add a scheduledDeliveryTime attribute to the ref, then there's no need for a separate addScheduledDelivery method, so they should be combined. More over the current addScheduledDelivery method bypasses all the message and size counting done in add. theres a ScheduledMessageTest under the timing tests. Ive also added some tests to unut tests that already exist, journalManagerTest etc anonymous wrote : | If you're going to add a scheduledDeliveryTime attribute to the ref, then there's no need for a separate addScheduledDelivery method, so they should be combined. | | More over the current addScheduledDelivery method bypasses all the message and size counting done in add.anonymous wrote : | | | | Ok i'll sort View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4180963#4180963 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4180963

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Factors that may affect the ordering of messages and how

by gaohoward

anonymous wrote : | 6. JMS Replyto -- during a ordered delivery, if some messages has reploy to header specified, this will yield another message delivery. | | /In Odering Group/ -- We should ignore this case. as long as we get acked from the message delivery, we consider it's completed. | I don't understand the issue here I'm think if the Reply message delivery also belongs to the group processing, maybe doesn't make sense. anonymous wrote : | 8. Transactions -- transactions makes the messages delivery subject to an atomic operation. | | /In Ordering Group/ -- If any message in the ordering group is participates in any active transaction, its delivery won't be treated as completed until the transaction is committed or rolled back. | How do you cope with starvation? If only one message is delivered at a time This is a problem I need to find out a solution for. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4180962#4180962 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4180962

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums October 2008