October 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Merged ClassInfo annotation view?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Don't I need to make the changes on the Branch_2_0 branch for 2.0.0.x? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185553#4185553 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185553

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Status of LargeMessages work

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Another change I'm making is regarding the buffer on JBossMessage. JBossMessage is caching the buffer when it is created, but receiving message in chunks is replacing the buffer when necessary. So, I have changed it to not cache the ByteBuffer any more, and aways get the buffer from the inner Message. There was a TODO about getting the buffer lazily, so I've made the change. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185544#4185544 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185544

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Merged ClassInfo annotation view?

by alesj

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Ok, I'll have to see what I'm getting. | You can temp use 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT deployers - which has the latest fixes / tasks - as I've already deployed it into snapshot repo. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185541#4185541 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185541

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: [JBMETA-119] LocalBindingMetaData

by ALRubinger

"ALRubinger" wrote : "emuckenhuber" wrote : I guess it also should be possible to define a local-binding over the xml too? | | Yep, something in the XSD under session-beanType like: | | <xsd:element name="local-binding" type="jboss:local-bindingType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/> | | Of course that "maxOccurs" depends on what you want to do now re: allowing more than one binding. :) | | S, | ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185535#4185535 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185535

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: [JBMETA-119] LocalBindingMetaData

by ALRubinger

"emuckenhuber" wrote : I guess it also should be possible to define a local-binding over the xml too? Yep, something in the XSD under session-beanType like: <xsd:element name="local-binding" type="jboss:local-bindingType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185534#4185534 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185534

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Merged ClassInfo annotation view?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : | True, but w/o this fix: | - https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBDEPLOY-118 | you won't get the right MetaData. | - Bean's ScopeKey != ComponentDU ScopeKey. | But even then, you might run into problems --> see Adrian's last note/warning on JIRA's forum thread. | Ok, I'll have to see what I'm getting. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185509#4185509 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185509

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[TODO - DEVELOPMENT] - Re: JBOSS and Windows COM Integration

by vikramrc

Hi Scott, Good idea. Kindly feel free to name the project as per your convenience and set guidelines (if any). Thanks, best regards, Vikram View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185507#4185507 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185507

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[TODO - DEVELOPMENT] - Re: JBOSS and Windows COM Integration

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Note that Mark suggested using jbossdcom as the project name to avoid confusion with the jboss.com references on the jboss.org site. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185506#4185506 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185506

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBMICROCONT-243 - parsing and managed objects

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Actually, it should not be a deployer as it would be a deployer with no known inputs/outputs on which to generate the managed object for. There just should be a ManagedObjectCreator implementation that has the ManagedObjectFactory injected, and this in turn is injected into the DeployerWrapper/DeployersImpl. Right now the DeployerWrapper initializes its the ManagedObjectCreator from the Deployer if it implements that. This logic could be kept so that deployers could provide an override, but typically they would customize behavior using an InstanceClassFactory registration. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185501#4185501 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185501

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[TODO - DEVELOPMENT] - Re: JBOSS and Windows COM Integration

by vikramrc

Hi There, I am not sure if I understand the question correctly. May I know if you meant use CORBA to access Windows COM applications ? or something else . Can you please rephrase the question ? Thanks, best regards, Vikram View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185496#4185496 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4185496

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums October 2008