June 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: @Service and @Consumer in metadata

by emuckenhuber

"wolfc" wrote : | "emuckenhuber" wrote : 2) the @Consumer annotation defines: | | | | | ActivationConfigProperty[] activationConfig() | | | | | | | which is not represented by the JBossConsumerBeanMetaData nor defined in the jboss_5_0.xsd. | | So should this be added to the metadata and the xml schema? | Yes. So maybe JBossConsumerMetaData should extend JBossMessageDrivenBeanMetaData instead of JBossEnterpriseBeanMetaData? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159845#4159845 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159845

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JcaXAResourceRecovery

by jesper.pedersen

The current solution of depending on the JcaXAResourceWrapper class located inside the JCA implementation will not work over time. The current class in AS-5.0 is called XAResourceWrapper, but provides the same functionality as the old JcaXAResourceWrapper class. I think that we should put the wrapper classes (XAResourceWrapper / XidWrapper (JcaXid)) in the JCA SPI, so you can depends on them there. We could include some basic information in the XAResourceWrapper that would identify which resource archive the recovery currently is processing - like the EISProductName and EISProductVersion for starters. Later on we can provide facilities in the JCA SPI to request more information about the XAResource or the Xid -- like getJNDIName(XAResouce) and getJNDIName(Xid). But I want to take a deeper look at the implementation of these methods before committing the project to implement them. The first part of the post I could commit after the AS-5.0.CR1 release if you think it would benefit the users. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159834#4159834 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159834

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jPDL 4 early feedback

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Hm, I see. That may probably be right. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159832#4159832 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159832

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jPDL 4 early feedback

by camunda

Much easier for non XML gurus... Don't underestimate the advantage gained, because Java developer without any deeper XML or WS knowledge can just start with jPDL, without bothering about namespaces... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159831#4159831 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159831

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jPDL 4 early feedback

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | I agree with Tom, jPDL should be usable without any namespaces and even without the people knowing what namespaces are... | Why? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159827#4159827 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159827

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jPDL 4 early feedback

by camunda

anonymous wrote : yes. i thought of building out examples as i implemented the nodes. but it's probably wise to provide a few example jpdl files up front. | a set of wiki pages ? Yeah, would be much better. From a set of examples it is easy to catch the syntax... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159826#4159826 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159826

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jPDL 4 early feedback

by camunda

Ah, the namespace discussion again :-) I agree with Tom, jPDL should be usable without any namespaces and even without the people knowing what namespaces are... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159825#4159825 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159825

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Please subscribe to jbpm-dev@lists.jboss.org

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

but the idea was that core community would switch to using mailing list only. as the mailing list would contain mailing list + forum entries. while the forum only contains the forum posts, not the mailing list posts. for me, forum only is good. what is your preference ? forurm only or mailing list + forum ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159822#4159822 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159822

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: HOWTO deploy webapp dynamically

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | You create Deployment on the fly | Yes, please show me the code that creates the deployment on the fly - attaches the WMD and deployes it afterwards. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159816#4159816 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159816

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Getting control of Portal Page

by tulip

Hi, I have been presented with this challenge to display content on a portal page without having a portlet. So I need control of the page to display my data without deploying a portlet within the page. I currently JBoss portal 2.6.5 installed from the sources. I would truly appreciate guidance/suggestions. Thanks and Regards. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159814#4159814 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159814

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums June 2008