[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jPDL 4 early feedback
by tom.baeyens@jboss.com
"kukeltje" wrote : I keep saying that if people are that intelligent to use and extend jBPM, that have the knowledge, well, intelligence to at least understand the basics of namespaces....
I don't agree with this. I believe that has been the power.
Each time when I have to mess with namespaces there is at least some struggle in getting it to work properly:
* default versus prefixed namespace
* resolution of the xsd is always a problem as we want to publish it online, but we want all to run ok without internet connection. so we need to provide the xsd as a resources as well. then resolution of how it finds the xsd becomes non trivial and has to do with catalogue configuration and things like that.
* elementFormDefault and attributeFormDefault. i've struggled a lot with those and still not get all the possible combinations
this will make it a lot more difficult to plug in custom event listeners or activity types.
...and i'm not saying that we should ditch schema and namespaces. i'm only saying it's a requirement that it should also work without validation and namespaces.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159853#4159853
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159853
16 years