August 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Status on proxy-clustered

by ALRubinger

Brian: Workaround for EJBTHREE-1471 should be in place now, and integrated w/ AS. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4173075#4173075 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4173075

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Cleanup problem with Ejb3Registrar and proxy factories

by ALRubinger

I've fixed the problem with the Ejb3Registrar, as verified by the following test: /** | * Tests that an object bound with state other than "INSTALLED" may still be | * unbound from MC via the Ejb3Registrar | * | * EJBTHREE-1472 | */ | @Test | public void testUnbindFromControllerStateOtherThanInstalled() throws Throwable | { | // Create a new key/value pair for binding into MC | String name = "MyObject"; | Object value = new Object(); | | // Construct BMDB, adding an unmet dependency | BeanMetaDataBuilder bmdb = BeanMetaDataBuilder.createBuilder(name, value.getClass().getName()); | bmdb.addDependency("SomeDependencyThatDoesn'tExist"); | | // Install into MC, though because of the unmet dependency will not reach "INSTALLED" state | try | { | getBootstrap().getKernel().getController().install(bmdb.getBeanMetaData(), value); | } | catch (Throwable e) | { | throw new RuntimeException("Could not install at name \"" + name + "\" value " + value, e); | } | | // Ensure that the install didn't completely succeed | ControllerContext context = getBootstrap().getKernel().getController().getContext(name, null); | TestCase.assertTrue("The test object should not be fully installed for this test", !context.getState().equals( | ControllerState.INSTALLED)); | | // Unbind | Ejb3RegistrarLocator.locateRegistrar().unbind(name); | | // Check that we've unbound | boolean isUnbound = false; | try | { | Ejb3RegistrarLocator.locateRegistrar().lookup(name); | } | catch (NotBoundException nbe) | { | isUnbound = true; | } | TestCase.assertTrue("The test object should be unbound", isUnbound); | | } I guess I'll leave the checks that discovered this error in place in EJB3 Proxy JndiSessionRegistrarBase.deregisterProxyFactory(); after all, they gave us a nice fail-fast, right? ;) S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4173064#4173064 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4173064

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Paging discussion:

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : Also is it configurable on both an address and a global level? I don't have the global level size yet. I would know how to set destinations in page-mode when globalSize>MaxGlobalSizeBytes, but I don't know (at least not yet) when to start depaging... what rule should I use to start on depaging? I was thinking about edge cases where destinations will not receive any message given a single destination is using the whole memory configured on MaxGlobalSizeBytes. I have started another thread about this topic: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=141400 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4173057#4173057 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4173057

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Paging discussion:

by timfox

Great :) I would be interested in knowing how paging performs when paging multiple addresses concurrently. Also is it configurable on both an address and a global level? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4173051#4173051 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4173051

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: TransactionManager and AS' ServiceBindingManager

by jhalliday

A quick question: is there a way to construct a service binding just for the port number, rather than a host/port pair? | <constructor> | <parameter>TransactionManager</parameter> | <parameter>socketProcessId</parameter> | <parameter>10001</parameter> | </constructor> | does not do what I want. Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4173050#4173050 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4173050

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Paging discussion:

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

As part of the merging into trunk I will also merge Pager and PageManager into a single class. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4173047#4173047 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4173047

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Paging discussion:

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I have configured a server with -Xms64M and -Xms64M, configured MaxSize at 10M on my destination and I was able to send 500K messages to the server, without having a consumer, and later consume then as nothing special was happening. It worked so nicely that I thought I configured something wrongly, but I double checked all the configs and everything is working fine. I tested the 500K using 4 scenarios: - NonPersistent, NonTransactional - Persistent, NonTransactional - NonPersistent, Transactional - Persistent, Transactional I will start merging this on trunk now, as it will be easier to fix EasyMock tests on trunk (as some other refactoring may be happening till then). And BTW: Let me know if you plan any change around PostOffice at Trunk on the next few days. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4173045#4173045 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4173045

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - What's the future of jBPM BAM console?

by alartin

Hi all, We are very interested in the jBPM BAM(Biz Activity Monitor). We've found there was a subproject of bam console under the jbpm.3 in the CVS. Before we get deep into it, I have some questions about this subproject: 1. I've seen a blog said that SAM would replace the BAM(Maybe from JBoss Overlord project) and jbossian would say goodbye to the BAM. Is that case?If so, the current BAM will not be supported any longer, right? 2. jBPM will take a revolution for the public API so as to seperate a layer from implementation detail from user. Will it make an big impact on BAM project? Could you please give answer to my questions? Thanks a lot. regards, Xin View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4173005#4173005 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4173005

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: WS4EE and AS5

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

"richard.opalka(a)jboss.com" wrote : We generate web.xml/jboss-web.xml for JBoss AS 5 Beta 4 and we generate JBossWebMetaData for JBoss AS 5 trunk. JACC permissions are created based on the JBossWebMetaData. So I am suspecting that it seems to be some type of a timing issue that the WS processing (dynamic generation/metadata population) is happening beyond the Security Deployer that works on the metadata. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4172989#4172989 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4172989

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Classloading problem in proxy factories

by ALRubinger

With the JAR attached to EJBTHREE-1442, I see this test pass completely about 1/2 the time; transient failures likely related to indeterminate time for GC. Profiling reveals that all EJB3 Proxy objects are cleaned up, however, and this was previously not the case. So I say these changes are good. Ron: Would like to request an 2.4.0SP2 release of jboss-remoting as you've sent it here. Brian: Anything we can do to make the tests more bulletproof? I know we can't force a GC, but maybe put in a request for GC followed by Thread.sleep(5000); after everything runs? S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4172959#4172959 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4172959

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums August 2008