June 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Evolution of TcpDelegatingCacheLoaders/TcpCacheServers

by galder.zamarreno＠jboss.com

By entire cache under an FQN, do you refer to: - all the keys/values associated with the FQN or - all the keys/values associated with the FQN and the any children nodes of that FQN as well? What JBC version are you using? Finally, for the cache miss, what operation where you calling? Where you calling move() by any chance? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4234849#4234849 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4234849

14 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Sending NonTransactional Messages with journal-sync-non-

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Also.. the sync is working correctly. a journal sync (commit, prepare, rollback or non-transaction-add) will never take more than the configured timeout. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4234837#4234837 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4234837

14 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: How to Expose MBean Invocation Stats into admin-console?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Emanuel has put out a JBossMan.2.1.1.Beta2 release. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4234830#4234830 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4234830

14 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Sending NonTransactional Messages with journal-sync-non-

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I could run this ok on both NIO and AIO by adding blocking parameters on the perf-test. BTW: on this typical usecase, AIO will be way slower because of the TimedBuffer, but it should scale when you have many threads. (I know Tim knows this... Saying this for everybody else). But if you set journal-aio-flush-on-sync = true on the main configuration file, the Journal will not wait any timeouts and it will flush the same way NIO would when a commit arrives. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4234821#4234821 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4234821

14 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Sending NonTransactional Messages with journal-sync-non-tran

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I and Tim were running runServer/perfSender with journal-sync-non-transactional = true. And we were having timeouts when doing it. This is what I found about the test we were doing: - it doesn't make sense to set journal-sync-non-transactional = true, if we don't make BlockOnPersistentSend, BlockOnAcknowledge as true also. The client will be sending as fast as it can, but blocking on the server. What will fill up the channel in a way you won't be able to send even pings and pongs. The same thing would happen on both AIO and NIO. (I mean.. it would fail on both cases). We should probably log a warning on server if Block = false && sync-on-non-transactional = true. We should at least document this Warning/Note. - There is another issue on QueueImpl when sync-on-non-transactional. if sync-non-transactional, both store message, storeReference and eventually updateScheduledDeliveryTime will be calling sync. so.. that would be 3 syncs for every message sent with sync-non-transactional. | | QueueImpl... | ... | method route () | .... | if (tx == null) | { | if (durableRef) | { | if (!message.isStored()) | { | storageManager.storeMessage(message); | | message.setStored(); | } | | storageManager.storeReference(ref.getQueue().getPersistenceID(), message.getMessageID()); | } | | if (scheduledDeliveryTime != null && durableRef) | { | storageManager.updateScheduledDeliveryTime(ref); | } | | addLast(ref); | } | Maybe we should open a transactional if sync-non-transactional. On ServerSessionImpl: | | private void doSend(....) | { | if (sync-non-transactional) | { | .... initialize a transaction somehow... | ... do what you're supposed to do | ... transaction.commit(); | } | else | { | ... regular flow | } | | | } | | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4234820#4234820 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4234820

14 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Log for task start in jbpm 3.3.1.GA

by osvaldo.pina

I think there is no relation between task starts and process start (maybe for the task on the start state when its configured). The non existence of the task start log is a bug? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4234811#4234811 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4234811

14 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Location of Service Binding Manager bindings.xml file

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Back from vacation; plowed through the emails. Thanks Jaikiran for the post on how the location can be moved. Re: changing this for 5.1.1, I want to echo Emanuel's question: what's the issue for the console here? The SBM exposes an interface via the ProfileService ManagementView; that's the way a console should deal with this, which I would think would make the location of the file irrelevant. BTW, Emanuel, Scott and I got a SBM management interface working right before I went on vacation and I had no time to document it for you Heiko. That is now corrected: http://www.jboss.org/community/wiki/ServiceBindingManagerManagementInterface I certainly agree that having this file be in a central location is the right thing to do for AS 6, but for 5.1.1 it becomes a kludge. It's been this way since 5.0.0 and I haven't heard any complaints about it from the community. Perhaps that just means people don't change this much. Hmm, one issue is if the SBM content is changed via the PS ManagementView, the changes are stored in the target server's data/attachments dir. So they don't apply to all nodes that might be using a given SBM config. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4234806#4234806 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4234806

14 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Orchestrating ESB service in BPEL

by jeffdelong

Look at the samples/quickstarts/publish_as_webservice example of how to publish ESB service as a web service. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4234804#4234804 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4234804

14 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Orchestrating ESB service in BPEL

by sai_ari

I am trying to orchestrate services using BPEL. That requires WSDL. By default JBOSS ESB service has no WSDL published.How can we publish ESB service as web service ? OR DO you see any other ways of invoking ESB service from BPEL? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4234803#4234803 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4234803

14 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Does KernelBusRuntimeComponentDispatcher handle lifecycl

by emuckenhuber

"alesj" wrote : | Or should there be some more logic to it? | e.g. handling 'jbossInternalLifecycle' I think that should be fine the way it is. I briefly tested that with a MC snapshot - and it seems to work fine. So this should be solved once we get a MC update and the patch to ServiceControllerContext. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4234747#4234747 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4234747

14 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums June 2009