July 2010 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Tools Development] - Portlet Development is Effectively Unusable in JBoss Tools

by Robert Brown III

Robert Brown III [http://community.jboss.org/people/factor3] created the discussion "Portlet Development is Effectively Unusable in JBoss Tools" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/554308#554308 -------------------------------------------------------------- I am attempting to use JBoss Tools to develop portlets, and its so- called "support" for portlets does not work. I have read the documentation and have downloaded the tools that are supposed to support portlet development. According to the documentation, in order to begin portlet development we are supposed to create a "Dynamic Web Project" and setup the project to work within a JBoss runtime. Instead of using the default configuration for the server, we are supposed to click "Modify" and, in the Facet window we are supposed to select the checkbox for Portlet support. Trouble is: there +is no+ "Portlet support" checkbox! Without portlet support, any attempt to create portlets to run within a Portal server creates failures. In fact, some of the failures have been known to crash Helios. Note that thie problem of missing Portlet support facets is not new to the latest Tools. This problem also exists in versions designed for Eclipse 3.5 installations as well. Until this problem is fixed, your tools are completely unusable for portlet development. Note that for this reason, I will likely be using OpenPortal tools for my portlet development until someone fixes thios problem. Are there any plans to fix this problem? -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/554308#554308] Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Wiki Portlet Development] - Portlet Development is Effectively Unusable in JBoss Tools

by Robert Brown III

Robert Brown III [http://community.jboss.org/people/factor3] created the discussion "Portlet Development is Effectively Unusable in JBoss Tools" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/554307#554307 -------------------------------------------------------------- Greetings: I am attempting to use JBoss Tools to develop portlets, and its so- called "support" for portlets does not work. I have read the documentation and have downloaded the tools that are supposed to support portlet development. According to the documentation, in order to begin portlet development we are supposed to create a "Dynamic Web Project" and setup the project to work within a JBoss runtime. Instead of using the default configuration for the server, we are supposed to click "Modify" and, in the Facet window we are supposed to select the checkbox for Portlet support. Trouble is: there is no "Portlet support" checkbox! Without portlet support, any attempt to create portlets to run within a Portal server creates failures. In fact, some of the failures have been known to crash Helios. Note that thie problem of missing Portlet support facets is not new to the latest Tools. This problem also exists in versions designed for Eclipse 3.5 installations as well. Until this problem is fixed, your tools are completely unusable for portlet development. Note that for this reason, I will likely be using OpenPortal tools for my portlet development until someone fixes thios problem. Are there any plans to fix this problem? -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/554307#554307] Start a new discussion in JBoss Wiki Portlet Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server] - Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration

by Flavia Rainone

Flavia Rainone [http://community.jboss.org/people/flavia.rainone%40jboss.com] replied to the discussion "Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/554296#554296 -------------------------------------------------------------- > Pete Muir wrote: > > If a class can't be loaded by the classloader then I can't see how Weld would end up with the Class object to pass to loadBeanDeploymentArchive... In that case, the "is reachable check" is pointless and I'm replacing the current implementation of loadBDA by one that uses a singleton map of CL->Archives. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/554296#554296] Start a new discussion in JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [jBPM Development] - JBPM-2772 retrieve business key from sub-process

by Maciej Swiderski

Maciej Swiderski [http://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej] replied to the discussion "JBPM-2772 retrieve business key from sub-process" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/554263#554263 -------------------------------------------------------------- I was wondering if that is what we shall provide in this case - to me somehow it looks like incorrect information. Subprocess business key is not set so it shall return null, returning it parent business key can be sometimes misleading, can be misinterpreted as parent and can cause some unexpected behavior. Perhaps better approach would be to enable possibility to set business key for a sub process when starting it from parent?! -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/554263#554263] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] - JBPM-2913 let duedate of process support expression

by HuiSheng Xu

HuiSheng Xu [http://community.jboss.org/people/rebody] created the discussion "JBPM-2913 let duedate of process support expression" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/554251#554251 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Maciej, I repack your patch and upload it to the JIRA. I think this patch is good enough. Could you checked it into the svn when you have time? Thank you very much. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/554251#554251] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [jBPM Development] - JBPM-2815 add suspend/resume process instance method in executionService

by HuiSheng Xu

HuiSheng Xu [http://community.jboss.org/people/rebody] replied to the discussion "JBPM-2815 add suspend/resume process instance method in executionService" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/554233#554233 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Maciej, Thank you for reviewing, I uploaded a new patch with testcase. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/554233#554233] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server] - Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration

by Pete Muir

Pete Muir [http://community.jboss.org/people/petemuir] replied to the discussion "Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/554227#554227 -------------------------------------------------------------- If a class can't be loaded by the classloader then I can't see how Weld would end up with the Class object to pass to loadBeanDeploymentArchive... -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/554227#554227] Start a new discussion in JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server] - Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration

by Flavia Rainone

Flavia Rainone [http://community.jboss.org/people/flavia.rainone%40jboss.com] replied to the discussion "Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/554219#554219 -------------------------------------------------------------- > Ales Justin wrote: > > How often is this - loadBeanDeploymentArchive - method used? > > Or, shouldn't the (potential) operation [Archive|Deployment]::isReachable(Archive other) be O(1), > a simple hash lookup of pre-build reachable archives / deployments? I was mentioning keeping only a single map of CL->Archives and bypassing the is reachable check. My argument on this is that is it really possible that Weld will request for a non reachable beanClass? If the beanClass is not reachable from the current deployment CL, the code won't run, because the CL can't load beanClass. Thus, IMHO, I don't think that it is possible that Weld will ever request for a beanClass associated with an Archive that is not visible to the current Deployment. But, as I don't know nothing about Weld implementation, I'm hoping that Pete or Ales will answer this question ;) Having a pre-built map of reachable archives is totally a different story, i.e., more complex to implement and will incur at an extra cost to maintain (I have again to walk through the graph to be able to define which archives are visible, this time it won't be done at every loadBeanDeploymentArchive request; but it will be done for every pre-existing deployment at every new deployment, and the cost will increase according to the number of Archives we have in Default Domain). -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/554219#554219] Start a new discussion in JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server] - Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration

by Ales Justin

Ales Justin [http://community.jboss.org/people/alesj] replied to the discussion "Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/554191#554191 -------------------------------------------------------------- > > How often is this - loadBeanDeploymentArchive - method used? > Depends how many extensions are present, and how many beans/classes they add. It's used once per extension and once per bean or class it adds. So potentially, a lot... OK, thought so as well. Just wanted to make sure. :-) > > Or, shouldn't the (potential) operation [Archive|Deployment]::isReachable(Archive other) be O(1), > > a simple hash lookup of pre-build reachable archives / deployments? > > > That seems sensible to me. At least that's how I would impl things --> building proper indexes when things get deployed. So any potential lookup would be super simple aka fast. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/554191#554191] Start a new discussion in JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server] - Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration

by Pete Muir

Pete Muir [http://community.jboss.org/people/petemuir] replied to the discussion "Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/554189#554189 -------------------------------------------------------------- > Ales Justin wrote: > > How often is this - loadBeanDeploymentArchive - method used? Depends how many extensions are present, and how many beans/classes they add. It's used once per extension and once per bean or class it adds. So potentially, a lot... > Or, shouldn't the (potential) operation [Archive|Deployment]::isReachable(Archive other) be O(1), > a simple hash lookup of pre-build reachable archives / deployments? That seems sensible to me. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/554189#554189] Start a new discussion in JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2010