"thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : Yes, a good result of the meeting would be a
set of API interfaces/classes that everybody can agree on plus a set of CTS test cases
that exercises the API.
|
| The 1-Jan-2009 jBPM4 release should then provide an implementation of that agreed
API.
|
| In Jan we meet again and set the scope for 1-Mar and so on ...
|
| If we can stay focused on correctness and ease of use of the API it will be possible
to move quickly and enlarge the scope of functionality for given release cycles. This will
hopefully rather sooner than later lead to a jBPM4 release that can replace the current
jBPM3 product.
|
| The replacement criteria (and I say it again) is a product that passes the CTS through
the API. The functional scope of that product must be at least that of jBPM3.
|
| Key to good progress is to stay focused on what can actually get achieved in a given
release cycle plus delivery on an unconditional basis.
|
| A good indicator of this "we will deliver as promised" principal, is the
upcoming jBPM-3.3.0.GA release. The team succeeds if promised functionality is
unconditionally available by a certain date, sufficiently documented and properly
integrated in automated QA.
|
| You can monitor progress on the JIRA road map panel
|
|
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
|
| ... the remaining work load per individual with this report ...
|
|
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/ConfigureReport.jspa?filterid=12312168...
|
| ... and recent changes to the project here ...
|
|
http://jbpm.dyndns.org:8280/hudson/job/jBPM3-Matrix/changes
|
|
I agree 100%
Staying focussed on the core functionality without diverting into all kinds of nice cool
things which are not crucial for the next release will be hard for me.
But I have full faith that you will be our Moses that leads us to the promised land :-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4181191#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...