anonymous wrote :
| However, a generic API to cover the common subset of all process languages is
certainly desirable and in fact already exists in the PVM.
| I think the meeting should be about the specific API to cover the features of our
preferred process language.
|
This is my opinion too! I think thatâs what it was all about, define a common runtime
and basic API, common for all languages. And every language adds on top obviously own
behavior and APIâs.
And I think this was a good approach and somehow proved to work, or not?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4181409#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...