Scott Stark [
http://community.jboss.org/people/scott.stark%40jboss.org] replied to the
discussion
"Profiles in domain.xml"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/545946#545946
--------------------------------------------------------------
We need the ability to lock down the features and configuration on a server. That is not
to say that there is a need to support the implied capabilities given a set of
applications. However, that would require some processing of the deployment in order to
determine what capabilities were in use, including resources. So, if there is an
abstraction like:
<applications>
<web-app name="my-store" context-root="/the-best-store" ...>
</web-app>
</applications>
how much work has to be done to adequately identify the required capabilities? We can
define the default capabilities implied by the various application types, but ultimately
the user should be able to trim that down if they are not using certain features.
I still think the best comprimise would be to have profile definitions in the domain in
terms of the required capabilities potentially simplified by having implied capabilities
associated with each application type that could be overriden by the admin.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/545946#545946]
Start a new discussion in Management Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]