Richard, all these are non-problems.
"richard.opalka(a)jboss.com" wrote :
| * have the full control over the XML->Java binding process
| * have the full control over the code to do architectural changes
| * have the full control of X2JB project lifecycle (to fix/release immediately)
|
| I don't have that kind of control over the JAXB or XMLBeans thus I'm not going
to use
| JBossXB, JAXB, XMLBeans and other binding frameworks neither now nor in the future
| in my not JBoss related projects.
You can have all of that. I don't think anybody would mind.
There are lots of custom binding features in XB. You are welcome to add more.
There have never been a complaint about project lifecycle for the reason that there is no
roadmap. It's demand-driven. If someone needs a release we can do it often the same
day or whenever it's needed.
You want to do architectural changes - really no problem. Given that the existing users
are not affected of course. I guess that's the real thing you don't want to deal
with.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4241074#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...