JBoss development,
A new message was posted in the thread "Standalone JCA: JNDI binding for multiple
connection factories...":
http://community.jboss.org/message/528646#528646
Author : Jesper Pedersen
Profile :
http://community.jboss.org/people/jesper.pedersen
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
The 1.6 Final Draft November 2009 argues with itself over this:
Nah, 6.5.1.3, 17.5.1.1, 20.6.2, 20.6.3 specifies the implementation requirements for a CF
(javax.resource.Referenceable + java.io.Serializable).
The text in 20.6.1 gives a hint to the implementor, that if the +naming server+
doesn't support both mechanisms, one can be used. See the 3 bullets in the section.
I'm not sure about the unique name part though.
Yes, this has to be designed.
What is the alias? Do you mean generically or with something
like a LinkRef (I've never used that before so not sure how it works
yet).
Something like,
java:/eis/myresourceadapter --> java:/uniquenamegeneratedbythecontainer
LinkRef or other solutions is an implementation detail, we can worry about once we have
the design for the unique names.
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page:
http://community.jboss.org/message/528646#528646