Tom Fennelly [
http://community.jboss.org/people/tfennelly] replied to the discussion
"Naming for webservice endpoints"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/559712#559712
--------------------------------------------------------------
For SOAPProcessor, how about also supporting the context defined on the
"jbossws-endpoint" property (eliminating the need for the
"jbossws-context" property) ala:
<property name="jbossws-endpoint" value="myapp:fooservice"/>
Of course, making sure it's backward compatible etc.
For "pure" consistency between SOAPProcessor and SOAPProxy, couldn't they
both be coded to also support exactly the same format for internal endpoints i.e.
<property name="jbossws-endpoint" value="foo:HelloWorldWS"/>
and
<property name="wsdl" value="foo:HelloWorldWS"/>
So in the later... the "internal" scheme is implied by the absence of a
scheme.... hmmm actually "foo" would be the scheme. Actually... something that
looks odd with the SOAPProxy. The wsdl URI is kinda corrupt when defining it ala
"internal://foo:HelloWorldWS". Looks like a URI, but "HelloWorldWS"
is where a port number would be expected. Wouldn't that be an invalid URI syntax?
Maybe ye don't care about that, but I'd have though it would be good to maintain a
valid URI (parseable etc).
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/559712#559712]
Start a new discussion in JBoss ESB Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]