"jtyrrell" wrote : David W, was working on XSLT in/out of a gateway (it was faster the smooks for him) he was writing around Web Services, should that idea be included in this gateway. Does that even make sense? I dropped the XSLT capability of the SOAPProxy a long time ago. It didn't make architectural sense, as it makes the proxy do more than it is supposed to. Daniel Bevenius wrote an XsltAction, which can be put in front of and/or after the SOAPProxy, which makes a lot more sense for the pipeline ala' "separation of concerns". View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4252358#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...