Re: [jbosscache-dev] JBoss Cache 2.2.0

Is array interception critical for AS 5? I'm guessing no, otherwise it would have been in the 2.1.0 feature list. :-) On 18 Mar 2008, at 15:34, Jason T. Greene wrote: > My number one goal for 2.2 is array interception, and a few minor > enhancements. The array interception code is in place, most of my work > will be on fixing javassist and AOP, so we will need to do a > dependency change for 2.2 as well. > > Manik Surtani wrote: >> Guys, >> What do you think should be in 2.2.0, and what should be in 3.x? Not >> just for Core, but POJO as well? >> I think that 2.2.0 should be a very quick release, my target for GA >> being mid-May or so, so we can get back on to 3.x tasks (some of >> which, like MVCC, I will be doing in parallel to 2.2.0 tasks). >> Brian, does this make sense, since the main goal of 2.2.0 is, apart >> from some more refactoring and a few features, to be rock-solid for >> AS 5 (given the way AS 5 deadlines are moving). With GA targeted for >> mid-May, I would think the first betas would start coming out in 2 - >> 3 weeks? >> Main tasks for core cache: >> - bug fixes reported on 2.1.0, inc. JBCACHE-1170, JBCACHE-1190, >> JBCACHE-1258 >> - new features, inc. JBCACHE-789, JBCACHE-1262, JBCACHE-1273 >> - optimisations/refactoring, inc. JBCACHE-890, JBCACHE-611, >> JBCACHE-1222, JBCACHE-1239, >> Jason, what are your thoughts for POJO Cache? >> Cheers >> Manik >> -- >> Manik Surtani >> Lead, JBoss Cache >> manik(a)jboss.org >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosscache-dev mailing list >> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev > > > -- > Jason T. Greene > JBoss, a division of Red Hat -- Manik Surtani Lead, JBoss Cache manik(a)jboss.org