Re: [jbosscache-dev] Updated to commons-logging 1.1.1 (for now...)

I think JGroups is the only one. I think we need to sort out some sort of logging standard for JBoss. Who wants to bell THAT cat, now? :-) On 18 Aug 2008, at 14:57, Bela Ban wrote: > I agree on the insanity of it all. Good that JGroups is not the only > dep which requires you to suck in commons-logging... :-) > > Manik Surtani wrote: >> It *is* commons logging. >> >> On 16 Aug 2008, at 09:12, Bela Ban wrote: >> >>> Actually, which logging library does JBossCache use today ? I >>> thought it was commons-logging... >>> >>> Jason T. Greene wrote: >>>> Manik Surtani wrote: >>>>> >>>> >> >> <SNIP /> >> >>>>> Hmm, another jar dep. We need commons logging anyway for JGroups. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately I already have to include JBoss Logging since AOP >>>> uses it. >> >> For chrissake. Why on earth is LOGGING of all things such a >> challenge? So this means using JBC with Hibernate will NOW need >> commons logging (JBC, JGroups), jboss logging (AOP) and slf4j >> (Hibernate), and all the while the JDK provides logging as well?!? >> This is insane. >> >> -- >> Manik Surtani >> Lead, JBoss Cache >> manik(a)jboss.org >> >> >> >> > > -- > Bela Ban > Lead JGroups / Clustering Team > JBoss - a division of Red Hat > -- Manik Surtani Lead, JBoss Cache manik(a)jboss.org