Re: [jbosscache-dev] Bundling JBossJTA in JBossCache
Sounds good but given that a lot of folk would be using JBC in a Java
EE environment with another TM present anyway, bundling JBossTS could
be misinterpreted to mean that we only support JBossTS. Ok, weak
argument since people currently swap out the DummyTM happily enough.
Good idea, although I agree with Bela that we should move this to 2.2.0.
Hang on, Brian extends the DummyTM in HTTP session clustering to
provide invocation batching (BatchModeTransactionManager). While we
do want to move away from this and provide a way of batching that is
not dependent on JTA [1], if we want to swap out the DummyTM and
replace with JBossTS we'd better make sure the BMTM approach still
works or we have the alternate approach in place.
Cheers,
Manik
[1] JBCACHE-991
On 27 Sep 2007, at 07:05, Bela Ban wrote:
Sure, but don't we have more important things to do right now ?
Let's do it, but I wouldn't do it *now*
Jason T. Greene wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am not sure if there has been a discussion on this before, but
> What do you guys think about replacing the DummyTransactionManager
> with JBoss(Arjuna)JTA? Perhaps it makes sense to leave it as a
> mock test, but I was thinking it might be a good idea to offer
> everyone an integrated solid TM out of the box.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Jason
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
--
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups / JBoss Clustering team
JBoss - a division of Red Hat
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat