"kukeltje" wrote : Well... Since I think not many people use it this way, I'd not qualify the 'bug' as serious. The risk is that if this is changed, some other things fall over. Things that might be more used
I do not agree: the documentation is very specific about that variables have contexts and that value can be assigned to tokens or the roottoken per default. The documentation is based on the concept / specification of jBMP.
If the actual code behaves differently from its specification, I would consider that a major bug.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192013#4192013
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192013
"kukeltje" wrote : anonymous wrote : I assume more people do this.
|
| If I find the time (remember, I do not work for JBoss/RH and only do this in my free time) I'll try to make a unit test without scripting and see what happens then.
|
|
I know and it is highly appriciated. Personally I also contribute at times to open source projects, but at the moment I'm not feet-solid on jBPM yet. Still feeling my way around.
But if this is indeed not working, I assume there are JBoss developers interested in such a IMHO serious bug. since JBPM is used by a lot of also commercial applications.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191980#4191980
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191980
