November 2009 - jbpm-users - Jboss List Archives

[jBPM Users] - Re: jbpm.wire.bindings.xml

by kukeltje

I wish I could inject them through jsr-299 / 303. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265934#4265934 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265934

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: jBPM 3.2.6.SP1 enterprise environments question

by kukeltje

Ahhh..... ok, I misunderstood you. Well, my blog entry is online View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265933#4265933 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265933

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: facing issues while assigning parallel task in jbpm usin

by kukeltje

PLEASE.... read http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=158610 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265927#4265927 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265927

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: jBPM 3.2.6.SP1 enterprise environments question

by salaboy21

It's not complicated from my point of view, but for a newbie that looks in the documentation for that kind of things it's very complicated. Because the Java EE configurations are not well documented. (It's just my opinion.) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265926#4265926 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265926

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: jBPM 3.2.6.SP1 enterprise environments question

by kukeltje

To complicated? No, it's very easy... I'll try writing my blog entry nonight. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265925#4265925 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265925

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: candidate-groups

by kukeltje

I agree that the task should show up only once. I think you ran into a non-tested issue here. Please file a jira issue for this and preferably add a unit test to it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265923#4265923 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265923

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: JBPM 4.2 - Manage JBPM users - recommended way? How to u

by kukeltje

Try searching for 'identity service' and things like 'custom'. Creating your own identity service is the best way to approach this. No need to replicate data then. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265921#4265921 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265921

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: jBPM 4.2 GWT Console Login

by kukeltje

and you thanks for reporting back. That way topics are really useful to others View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265919#4265919 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265919

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: [jBPM 4.2] MySQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException en

by kukeltje

if you take a look at the sticky post in this topic (also read the second post about the unittest), you'll see a description on how to post possible issues. The unit test (although not explicitly mentioned in Tom's post *is* important for us to easily try to reproduce View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265918#4265918 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265918

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: Jbpm 4.2 how to enable variable history

by kukeltje

"xalperte" wrote : Hi Ronald, | | The historic functionality is important but not basic to run the system in production. | | The real problem, and I consider very serious, is that we're losing all the data associated with the instance when it reaches the end state. | | Thanks. That is what the histyory tables are for. Having all (relevant) data available after a process instance ends. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265916#4265916 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265916

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-users November 2009