No, not irrelevant. I just didn't know how to answer. :)
A few days ago Michael said something very true: "- A remember sometime
ago when I knew everything there were to know about Drools!"... ;)
[]s
Edson
2009/1/22 Herman Post <Herman.Post(a)imail.org>
Thanks for responding. I am evaluating Guvnor for use by
non-programmers
in my
organization. A programmer can figure out how to work around issues, but
non-programmers become frustrated quickly, so I think this is important.
Are the other two issues I mentioned irrelevant in your opinion?
Thanks,
Herm
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Edson Tirelli
*Sent:* Thursday, January 22, 2009 6:19 PM
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Guvnor Issues
Regarding #3, it is not a Guvnor issue. In fact, if you are declaring
types in the DRL file directly, you will face the same limitation. Feel free
to open the Jira for #3 against drools-core/drools-compiler. Can't promise I
will be able to get to that any time soon, but it is something I think it is
worth doing.
[]s
Edson
2009/1/22 Herman Post <Herman.Post(a)imail.org>
Hi,
I've been working with the Model feature in Guvnor 5.M4 and have some
questions:
1. Is there a way to delete a fact type once created?
2. When I declare a field as a Date it gets included as a java.lang.Date
and the fact will not validate.
3. If I have created two facts, the one created first cannot reference
the second one as the type of a field. The second on can reference the
first. It would be nice to support this forward -referencing feature.
I'd be happy to enter any of these in Jira if they are not already present
(couldn't
find them).
Thanks,
Herm
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com