Re: [rules-users] [planner] Drools planner & Scala => Solution.getScore():Score<?>

Hello, > Michael Neale (the drools guvnor guy) is also using Scala and Drools > Planner together. His code is at github. I was looking for his account but a search for "Neale" only finds some comments in BMW's repos. You know what his username is? > If the issue still makes sense, feel free to open an issue for the > org.drools.planner.core.solution.Solution#getScore():Score<?> > discussion (and copy this part of the discussion). > Why should it be Score<?> and not > 2) Score<S extends Score> > 3) or Score<<S extends Score<S extends Score> >> ? Well in case 2) Scala would still complain about a missing type parameter for the inner Score. Same for 3, it could go on forever. So for recursive type parameters you need to stop at some point and put in a wildcard (? in java or _ in scala). Score<?> and Score have the same meaning in Java (they both mean any Score), the only difference is that one works, the other not in Scala ;). And for the use in the Solution interface I think it's write - the get/set method store any score, you don't know which one. > 4) Or maybe it should be, just like EnumSet? > class Solution<S extends Score> { > public S getScore() > } This would of course work also, but it's a much bigger refactoring. And it could have some viral consequences. Score<?> instead of Score is just a drop-in replacement :).