Re: [rules-users] Dynamic Fact Types

Hi Thomas - Interesting idea. I was trying to get to the point where the classes weren't first class Java classes, but where the Java classes were meta-classes for classes defined in data (if that makes sense). On the other hand given appropriate black-boxing, what you propose sounds reasonable. Thanks, James -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Dynamic-Fact-Types-tp... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.