Re: [rules-users] NPE on fact insertion if rule has sliding window

laune wrote: > > There's a bug in the incremental build as done by the KnowledgeAgent. If > the > KA configuration property drools.agent.newInstance is set to false, some > type information is not put into the new KBase. > I added the following comment to the JIRA related to this issue (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3145). Cross-posting here in case anyone else is having the issue and arrives here via Google like I did. "I am seeing the same behavior with my KA newInstance = true. I was able to workaround it by ensuring that my event POJOs are defined in the same package as my rules. In other words, this DOES NOT work: Rule package: com.example.rules POJO package: com.example.rules.model (import statements included in DRL) This DOES work: Rule package: com.example.rules POJO package: com.example.rules (no import statements required) I did not have to move my event declaration to my DRL; they are still POJOs. I would prefer to have my POJOs in their own package but I can live with this workaround for now." Mike -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/NPE-on-fact-insertion-if-rule-has-slidi... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users