[rules-users] Drools Flow: Validation Chain Approach

Hey Drools Flow Crowd, Would appreciate your thoughts on: Validation One Node || \/ Validation Two Node || \/ Validation Three Node || \/ Validation Four Node ... ... If any errors are found at any validation node, the process should terminate with proper logging, etc.. What would be your approach of a clean way to do it in order to avoid cluttering the process definition with a splitter after individual "Validation XYZ Node": Validation One Node || \/ SPLITTER => Finalize => End ( or Fault node, which is as dirty ) || \/ Validation Two Node || \/ SPLITTER => Finalize => End || \/ Validation Three Node || \/ SPLITTER => Finalize => End || \/ Validation Four Node ... ... Thanks for your input, /Anatoly -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-Validatio... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.