Re: [rules-users] drools vs jbpm

Hey! If you asked for "just" a rule engine, this is nothing available in jBPM (which is a process engine). If you asked for processes and workflow then I have a follow up question for Mark: Is there already any timeline on jBPM 5?

Cheers Bernd -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] Im Auftrag von Mark Proctor Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. September 2010 19:52 An: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org Betreff: Re: [rules-users] drools vs jbpm On 21/09/2010 18:07, woods5242-photography(a)yahoo.com wrote: > Hi, > We need a rules engine for our project and I am trying to determine the main > differences between Drools and JBPM. Can anyone on here provide a brief > explanation maybe offering why one is better than the other, chances of them > being merged or one being retired over the other? Are they competing projects? Drools Flow will be incorporated into jBPM5. The safest bet for now is to adopt Drools Flow, as the changes for adoptiong jBPM5 when we release it will be minimal. Mark > thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users