Re: [rules-users] RHS start ruleflow not executing associated rules
As you suggested, I ran the faulty process directly. The error was based in
part
a misinterpretation of the AND split functionality. It was flowing through
unmatching rules
and terminating the process before other rules had completed. Resolved it
with AND join.
Kris Verlaenen wrote:
> At issue, the rules within the second ruleflow, though activated, are not
> being executed.
Do you have a test case that shows this behaviour? If you open a JIRA and
attach the test case, I'll take a look. Have you tried starting the
process
directly using the startProcess method on the working memory directly?
Does
this change the situation? In theory, there should be no difference in
starting a process, no matter how you start it. And ruleflow groups
should
only deactivate if there are no more activated rules in the ruleflow
group.
Kris
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/RHS-start-ruleflow-not-executing-associated-rules-t...
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.