[rules-users] Extending type declaration

A fairly major blocker for some work I am doing is the ability to extend type declarations: declare B extends A .. end Such that the patterns take into account the polymorphism (which I think they already do). Is there any plans for this type of feature and/or is there a way of intercepting the resulting Java definition arising from the syntax in order to programmatically set this? Thanks, James -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Extending-type-declar... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.