[rules-users] Can we use rule "extends" option in decision tables?

Today's drools blog post ( http://blog.athico.com/2012/09/conditional-named-consequences-in.html ) pointed out a rule option I hadn't noticed: the "extends" option to let one rule extend another one. There is little info in the Expert docs about this, but I tried it out with drl rules and it seems to work beautifully. I can see big potential for simplifying some of our currently quite repetitive rules. My question: can this option be used in a decision table and if so, how? I don't see any reference to it in the decision table documentation. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Can-we-use-rule-extends-option-in-decis... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.