Re: [rules-users] Package footprint

Hi all, I'm trying to reduce the memory footprint of packages in my application (for performance reasons they are dynamically loaded from disk), and I was wondering if some of you had any experience with the subject? So far the optimizations that I can come up with in 5.4.0.Final version are all about reducing the sizes of generated classes: - Package name in the drl file should be as small as possible, one letter is best (even better that no package at all) - Rule name should be as small as possible as it is used to generate the consequence class name - Write as less code as possible in the consequence - Use as few as possible eval statements - By using my own JavaDialectConfiguration and MVELDialectConfiguration when building the knowledge, I can remove the random number on class names that was added in the recent versions (don't understand why it was added in the first place? Does anyone know?) I see some leeway to shorten the names of the following generated classes but the amount of overriding to change the "default" consequence name and the suffixes is a bit too exotic for me: - <PackageName>.<RuleName>DefaultConsequenceInvoker - <PackageName>.<RuleName>DefaultConsequenceInvokerGenerated Any advice, other leads some of you might have? Thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Package-footprint-tp4019721.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users