Re: [rules-users] How to use KnowledgeAgent in the "old manner" (just like RuleAgent)

Paul Sentosa wrote: > Hi, > > Mark, thanks for the links and explanation. > So if I use Guvnor for administrating my rules, > - should I use the URL pointing to LATEST.DRL in change-set instead > of the one in package snapshot to get the latest version of rules? > > - I assume the communication between my application and the Guvnor > will happen by the time applyChangeSet-method (which defines a > resource by pointing to the URL of DRL) is called and internally > create package out of it (compared to the method > newRuleAgent("properties"). Is this correct? Is there any significat > difference in required time/performance? I added file scanning, I haven't yet added http scanning, I'll do that this week. the file and http scanning, work in the same manner as they do for the original rule agent. If you look at the file scanner now, you can see how to implement your own if you really need to. The framework is now designed that people can built their own resource monitors, so they can implement their own push based implementations.

Mark > > Again, thanks and appreciate your answer > > Regards > Paul > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; > *To:* Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2008 9:22:22 AM > *Subject:* Re: [rules-users] How to use KnowledgeAgent in the "old > manner" (just like RuleAgent) > > psentosa wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Can anyone give some explanation / examples on this? The docu is > still using > > ruleagent. > > I found some piece of codes within the KnowledgeAgentFactory, but I > saw that > > it uses the configuration object. > The javadocs: > https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t... > https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t... > > There are a number of unit tests you can follow: > http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-compiler/src/t... > > http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-compiler/src/t... > > http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-decisiontables... > http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-decisiontables... > > I personally prefer the old style by using > > a property file in which the configuration is defined. > > > The properties file does not offer enough flexibilility to support > all resource types - the xml really is quite simple - how do you > specify the worksheet name for a decision tree? In some ways it's > actually simpler and more powerful, as there is no separate line for > directories, it's just another resource and it detects that it's a > directory. ChangeSets will eventually support remove and modify, for > incremental knowledgebase changes, so the properties file just > doesn't cut it. > > <change-set> > <add> > <resource source='http://www.domain.com/test.drl' > <http://www.domain.com/test.drl%27> type='DRL' /> > <resource source='file://data/somedir' type='DRL' /> > <resource source='http://www.domain.com/test.xls' > <http://www.domain.com/test.xls%27> type='DTABLE' > > <decisiontable-conf worksheet-name='sheet10' input-type='XLS' /> > </resource> > </add> </change-set> > > > Mark > > > > Thanks in advance for any help > > > > Regards > > Paul > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >