Re: [rules-users] DSL and 5.3 Final

[condition][]ThereIsProgramHistoryData = ProgramHistory ( ) -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3870931&i=1> [mailto:[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3870931&i=2>] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 12:38 AM To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] DSL and 5.3 Final Please provide the DSL definition for ThereIsProgramHistoryData -W On 30/03/2012, Rob Fisher <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3870931&i=3>> wrote: > Having the following DSL statement coded: > > [condition][]- where {VarName} is {AttributeName} and is {operator} > {value}={VarName}: {AttributeName} {operator} {value} > > > DSLR looks like this: > ThereIsProgramHistoryData > - where $var01 is LevelPriorYear and is greater than 0 > > DSL parses to this: > ProgramHistory ($var01: levelPy > 0) > > Parsed just fine in 5.2 Final. Downloaded 5.3 today but am now > getting following error for every rule that uses the above DSL: > > "no viable alternative at input ','" > > The DRL looks like this : ProgramHistory ( , $var01: levelPy > 0) > > What changed in 5.3 that is causing the comma to be inserted? > > Any help is much appreciated! > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/DSL-and-5-3-Final-tp3869806p3869806. > html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3870931&i=4> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3870931&i=5> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3870931&i=6> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users