Re: [rules-users] simple subtraction in drools 5.3 fires rules

Drools says property accessors must not change the state of the object so I'm guessing your second example is not the correct way to do it in either drools version. Out of curiosity do things work right if you remove the ruleflow-group on your first rule in Drools 5.3? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/simple-subtraction-in-drools-5-3-fires-... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.