I'm a tiny bit alarmed by the lack of response here...while it's child's play
to hack around inside my pom.xml and restructure things to correct for the
bad transitive dependency settings, this is a pretty fundamental flaw in the
way Drools is depended upon by lots of people. Has anyone looked into this?
Best regards,
Laird
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/drools-compiler-5-1-0...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.