Re: [rules-users] Drool rules vs java code, effiency
Hello,
This is what i think (has to be confirmed from specialist)
Every thing you do in Drools you can do it as well in Java. But if you
have a modification on your java code, you have to modify, then compile
and deploy. contrary to the Drl rules which are interpreted, so after
modification you don't need to do any thing just save your modification.
So in the case of drools you have some flexibility which means that the
rules can be managed directly by the decider and not the developer.
regards,
Cheikh
Le 29/10/2012 23:57, kina06 a écrit :
Please don't ignore this question as routine, did google and read
posting,
didn't get satisfying answer, hope you guys can help.
I have seen some drool rules in our company, I know drools provide
declarative rules, easy to modify etc etc, but I see it does need some
programming knowledge, so why not put all your rule logic into Java code,
what is drools doing different can't be implemented in Java a separate
package (like your logic package). Except losing flexibility of modify
code/logic in text file I don't see much benefit.
Please help me understand, whats the major benefit of drools rules that
can't be done in Java with same set of concise code.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drool-rules-vs-java-code-effiency-tp402...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users