[rules-users] Re: 4.0 Language Updates
OK, I think I found it and here is what the rule could look like:
rule "Repayment Code Requires Approval"
salience 60
when
repaymentCode : RepaymentCode( code == "MD", matchApprv == "Y"
)
mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, sumCmAndRnr ==
$amt1)
then
System.out.println("Repayment Code Requires Approval");
processMDAdjustments(drools.getWorkingMemory().getQueryResults( "MD
Adjustments" ), StatusConstants.APPROVAL);
System.out.println("mdOutput: " + mdOutput);
end
Now my question is, how does Drools handle these objects and the comparison
because the underlying objects are BigDecimal?
On 7/9/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
All,
I have the following rule:
rule "Repayment Code Requires Approval"
salience 60
when
repaymentCode : RepaymentCode( code == "MD", matchApprv ==
"Y" )
mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2 :
sumCmAndRnr)
eval($amt1.doubleValue() == $amt2.doubleValue())
then
System.out.println("Repayment Code Requires Approval");
processMDAdjustments(drools.getWorkingMemory().getQueryResults(
"MD Adjustments" ), StatusConstants.APPROVAL);
System.out.println("mdOutput: " + mdOutput);
end
If I remember correctly, there was going to be an update to the rules
language that would allow me to eliminate the eval. Is this true and if so
what is the syntax that accomplishes this?
Ron
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.4 KB)