[rules-users] JPA vs Marshaller for session persistence

Are there any disadvantages to using the Marshaller instead of JPA for persistence? We are running Drools as an embedded service, and we would favor the Marshaller because we don't want to handle the persisting of the session id between system reboots. We're currently not using JPA in our system, and it seems unnecessary to add it just for Drools. In which scenarios would it be appropriate to use JPA and Marshalling respectively? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/JPA-vs-Marshaller-for-session-persisten... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.